Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
10/4/2016
10:04 AM
Ned Miller
Ned Miller
Partner Perspectives
50%
50%

Cyber-Anything-As-A-Service: Should The Government Just Outsource Everything?

Agencies should be able to select and provision from a variety of cybersecurity services and capabilities to improve their overall effectiveness and efficiency.

A day doesn’t go by without reading about another failed cybersecurity audit or successful cyberattack at a government agency or department. With budget constraints, lack of skilled resources, and limited ability to attract and retain experienced cyberdefenders, should the government just outsource its cybersecurity operations altogether? I have had the opportunity to explore this question recently with a number of CISOs across the public sector market, including state, local, and federal entities. The results were interesting.

Managed security services is a maturing market with a large range and variety of providers. Several industry analysts define MSS as "the remote monitoring or management of IT security functions delivered via shared services from remote security operations centers (SOCs), not through personnel on-site.” Typical services do not include staff augmentation, consulting, development, or integration services.

MSS outsourcing for government sounds like a promising alternative, but those who have been in this market for a while will recall there have been several attempts at this over the last 15+ years, with limited success. Several complex logistical challenges remain, not the least of which is secure access to government networks or data sovereignty for sensitive information. Still, government and industry have made tremendous progress in the last few years leveraging and adopting cloud services and cloud security models such as FedRAMP. Is there a new model of Cybersecurity-as-a-Service on the horizon that could enable the government to acquire cybersecurity operations as a turnkey service?

Every CISO acknowledged they have too few experienced cyberdefenders, are dealing with more threat volume than ever, and have too many tools and consoles to manage. Most of their resources are consumed in day-to-day firefighting, leaving little if any time for proactive defenses. Other significant challenges include accurately measuring how well they are protecting the organization and justifying the expenses required to do so more effectively.

The common theme across the CISO conversations is that hybrid models instead of total outsourcing of cyberoperations would help their cause. Outsourcing via remote monitoring SOCs is not enough. CISOs want hybrid models that include remote SOCs and on-premises SOC management. They prefer to have personnel on-site that includes staff augmentation, consulting, development, and integration services from a single vendor that can be held to mutually agreed upon SLAs and incident-response metrics. All that said, the CISOs strongly believe many of these services can be offered via new cloud services models such as SaaS and unique services contracts that focus on “outcomes as a service,” with pricing based on performance SLAs.

So should the government outsource its cybersecurity operations? In summary, the answer is yes. Government customers are looking for creative ways to outsource security operations. In the ideal scenario, they should be able to select and provision from a variety of cybersecurity services and capabilities to improve their overall effectiveness and efficiency, allowing their teams to focus on being more proactive and supporting their organizations’ mission. Look for a new class of cybersecurity service providers making its way into the market soon.

Ned Miller, a 30+ year technology industry veteran, is the Chief Technology Strategist for the Intel Security Public Sector division. Mr. Miller is responsible for working with industry and government thought leaders and worldwide public sector customers to ensure that ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Understanding Evil Twin AP Attacks and How to Prevent Them
Ryan Orsi, Director of Product Management for Wi-Fi at WatchGuard Technologies,  11/14/2018
Veterans Find New Roles in Enterprise Cybersecurity
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/12/2018
To Click or Not to Click: The Answer Is Easy
Kowsik Guruswamy, Chief Technology Officer at Menlo Security,  11/14/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-19296
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-16
PHPMailer before 5.2.27 and 6.x before 6.0.6 is vulnerable to an object injection attack.
CVE-2018-19301
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-15
tp4a TELEPORT 3.1.0 allows XSS via the login page because a crafted username is mishandled when an administrator later views the system log.
CVE-2018-5407
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-15
Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'.
CVE-2018-14934
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-15
The Bluetooth subsystem on Polycom Trio devices with software before 5.5.4 has Incorrect Access Control. An attacker can connect without authentication and subsequently record audio from the device microphone.
CVE-2018-14935
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-15
The Web administration console on Polycom Trio devices with software before 5.5.4 has XSS.