Analytics
4/15/2009
03:15 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Open Source Metrics On Tap For Security Patch Management

Securosis, Microsoft team up to solicit input for building a metrics model that measures efficiency and costs of security patching

Security consulting firm Securosis is spearheading a new effort to create metrics to quantify the cost and efficiency of an organization's security patching process.

Rich Mogull, founder of Securosis, says to date there's no real way to accurately measure the cost and productivity of an organization's security patch management process. "Those fully quantified [IT] risk models don't apply and the numbers aren't accurate," he says. "It's also bothered me to see those uber-metrics approaches that get an overview of everything in the security program. So why not start with one thing we can accurately measure and use it as a core for building security metrics?"

Securosis, with the financial backing of Microsoft for the initial phase of the project, will gather input in an open submission process for the so-called Project Quant metrics model. Version 1 is planned for release by the end of June.

Many organizations don't have actual processes for out-of-cycle security patches, and end up in "panic mode" trying to apply them, Mogull says. Some don't even have processes for the scheduled patching their Oracle software, for instance, he says.

"We know there are tremendous inefficiencies in how [organizations] approach patching," Mogull says. "We're going to solicit [organizations] out there and find out different ways people are doing this and find a way to quantify this."

Jeff Jones, a director in Microsoft's Trustworthy Computing Group who first approached Securosis about the project, says the goal is to offer metrics that are consumable for business decision-makers. "Vuln counts and data risk [data] is cool for my tech people, but we would really like to see firms doing some analysis and getting results that are more appropriate for the business level," Jones says.

The metrics model will cover everything in the patch management process, from monitoring software for updates to installing the patches. It will analyze things like the amount of time it takes to test patches and roll them out, for instance, and on how many systems, etc., Mogull says. "As compared with other things in security, you can get a reasonably accurate [accounting] of costs" here, he says. "We're going to come out with something that helps IT professionals get their jobs done better and that they can present to the business guys."

The creation of the model will be an open and transparent process, Mogull says. Any input from Microsoft's Jones, for instance, would be posted on the project Website just like any other submission, he says.

And Jones is hoping other vendors will help with the project. "I'm hoping we can drive participation from other people in the industry, like patch management tools companies and other vendors," he says.

Project Quant will be a spreadsheet-type model, where organizations can plug in numbers and rate their efficiencies and costs. Although version 1 won't include benchmarks, the final product will. Among the elements it will include: defining patch management roles and phases; measuring the actual cost of patching in an organization; and providing organizations a way to see how efficient their process is or is not, so they can improve it.

Microsoft's Jones says he hopes to gather information from some key Microsoft customers about their patch management processes and document their experiences as part of the project. "We need to have options of how the [metrics] might apply to different [size businesses] -- from the small business to the biggest enterprise," he says.

The metrics model will be released under a Creative Commons license, and spreadsheets will be available in both Excel and open formats.

"The vision is for this to [also] become an element that rolls into ... bigger models for server or systems management," Microsoft's Jones says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Threat Intel Today
Threat Intel Today
The 397 respondents to our new survey buy into using intel to stay ahead of attackers: 85% say threat intelligence plays some role in their IT security strategies, and many of them subscribe to two or more third-party feeds; 10% leverage five or more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-7298
Published: 2014-10-24
adsetgroups in Centrify Server Suite 2008 through 2014.1 and Centrify DirectControl 3.x through 4.2.0 on Linux and UNIX allows local users to read arbitrary files with root privileges by leveraging improperly protected setuid functionality.

CVE-2014-8346
Published: 2014-10-24
The Remote Controls feature on Samsung mobile devices does not validate the source of lock-code data received over a network, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (screen locking with an arbitrary code) by triggering unexpected Find My Mobile network traffic.

CVE-2014-0619
Published: 2014-10-23
Untrusted search path vulnerability in Hamster Free ZIP Archiver 2.0.1.7 allows local users to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse dwmapi.dll that is located in the current working directory.

CVE-2014-2230
Published: 2014-10-23
Open redirect vulnerability in the header function in adclick.php in OpenX 2.8.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the (1) dest parameter to adclick.php or (2) _maxdest parameter to ck.php.

CVE-2014-7281
Published: 2014-10-23
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shenzhen Tenda Technology Tenda A32 Router with firmware 5.07.53_CN allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that reboot the device via a request to goform/SysToolReboot.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.