IoT

Tesla Hacks: The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly

50%
50%

BLACK HAT USA 2017 -- Keen Security Lab researchers Sen Nie and Samuel Lv visit the Dark Reading News Desk to discuss how they found multiple holes in the isolation layer Tesla uses to protect drive systems from infotainment systems, but were impressed by the auto company's security in other ways.

Watch all 45 News Desk interviews at DarkReading.com/drnewsdesk.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
richardstorer
100%
0%
richardstorer,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/21/2017 | 6:25:36 AM
TOCTOU?
I found your paper very interesting. It's a bit depressing that Tesla have made all the same old mistakes!

One thing I noticed:

"Gateway checks the signature of the updater, which is the file boot.img. Once it is passed, gateway will turn into the update mode, load the boot.img file into ram and execute it."

It sounds like there might be a classic TOCTOU vulnerability there where boot.img could be replaced between check and loading into RAM. What do you think?
White House Cybersecurity Strategy at a Crossroads
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/17/2018
The Fundamental Flaw in Security Awareness Programs
Ira Winkler, CISSP, President, Secure Mentem,  7/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-3770
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
A path traversal exists in markdown-pdf version <9.0.0 that allows a user to insert a malicious html code that can result in reading the local files.
CVE-2018-3771
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
An XSS in statics-server <= 0.0.9 can be used via injected iframe in the filename when statics-server displays directory index in the browser.
CVE-2018-5065
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have a Use-after-free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.
CVE-2018-5066
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have an Out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2018-5067
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have a Heap Overflow vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.