IoT
6/8/2016
12:20 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Symantec Drives Into Automobile Security

Automakers quietly begin testing cybersecurity features for connected cars.

Just shy of a year after the infamous Jeep Cherokee hack by a pair of researchers, the automobile industry is quietly testing cybersecurity features from IoT startups and traditional security companies for its networked vehicles.

Symantec today added what is now its fourth car security product -- an anomaly detection system for automotive vehicles that is based on its existing technology as well as its Internet of Things line, timed with the TU-Automotive connected car conference in Detroit this week. The security vendor also sells Symantec Embedded Security, which includes Critical System Protection, Code Signing, and Managed Public Key Infrastructure for the auto sector.

The new auto security announcement also comes on the same day Symantec is issuing security patches for Symantec Embedded Security: Critical System Protection, its IoT endpoint security product for cars and other consumer products and devices. Symantec’s security updates fix flaws that allow an attacker to attain elevated privileges, cheat security protection, and run malware on agents.

Symantec’s pivot from pure consumer IoT security to the auto industry wasn’t a dramatic shift, and it’s one that several IoT startups are taking as well. It’s obviously a big change from Symantec’s antivirus roots. “We first began adapting security to smart connected things seven  years ago,” says Brian Witten, senior director of IoT security at Symantec.

Symantec’s new Anomaly Detection for Automotive monitors traffic on the vehicle’s Controller Area Network (CAN) bus and flags activity that’s out of the norm. “It can be embedded into the car and run on existing hardware ... it’s using only a small slice of CPU and memory,” Witten says, and the software uses machine learning techniques. He says Symantec is also considering adding managed security services to its menu of car cybersecurity offerings.

Intel also has been focusing on car hacking, with its own security test and audit board.

Witten says Symantec’s IoT security sits in over one billion “things,” and the security company expects to ultimately have embedded security in millions of vehicles per year. “We’ve signed world-leading carmakers,” he says.

But don’t expect to know which ones or even which automakers are embedding what type of security any time soon. Witten, as well as other car security vendors, are under strict non-disclosure about revealing which vehicle makes and models they’re securing, and automakers for the most part have been characteristically mum about their cybersecurity plans.

“They’re nervous about standing out in the crowd,” Witten says of automakers working to shore up their vehicle cybersecurity. “Many are very concerned that if they stick up their hand and say, ‘we are very secure,’ someone might be more eager to step forward” and hack them, he says.

“Right now, there’s no way to know if there’s [cyber] security in cars,” he says.

Connected car security startup Karamba Security this week rolled out Carwall, software that sits in the automobile’s electronic control units (ECUs) that control various functions of the car. It uses whitelists of functions to ferret out and stop any other activity that’s not legitimate, according to David Barzilai, Karamba Security's chairman and co-founder. “Once an operation goes out of factory settings ... and tries to attack, we detect and block it,” he says.

Barzilai says his company is teaming up with five Tier 1 automobile suppliers to test and roll out Carwall, which can also be used to retrofit security in existing vehicles, not just newly manufactured ones.

“Carmakers are very much gearing up and looking at new technologies and talking to security architecture teams and evaluating security solutions. They are taking action,” he says. “But there have been no public car security announcements from carmakers yet.”

A pair of recent studies show that drivers consider it the automakers’ responsibility to shore up cybersecurity in cars: some 90% of drivers said carmakers should be in charge even if the car’s apps were created by a separate software firm. Kelley Blue Book found that 55% of drivers say carmakers should provide security software to protect vehicles. Two-thirds of drivers say carmakers hold some responsibility for car hacks and half say they should provide insurance for car-hacking losses.

What has driven carmakers to finally get serious about securing their car’s software and network connections after for so long ignoring researchers who found flaws, including Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek?

Barzilai attributes the change of heart to both the highly publicized Jeep hack by Miller and Valasek as well as the Senate’s Security and Privacy in Your Car (SPY) Act introduced in July of 2015 that tasks the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHSTA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to create standards for car security and driver privacy. The Act also calls for a rating system that consumers can check for a car’s security and privacy.

Gartner estimates that by 2020, some 250 million connected cars will be on the roads.

Related Content:

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Printers: The Weak Link in Enterprise Security
Kelly Sheridan, Associate Editor, Dark Reading,  10/16/2017
20 Questions to Ask Yourself before Giving a Security Conference Talk
Joshua Goldfarb, Co-founder & Chief Product Officer, IDDRA,  10/16/2017
Why Security Leaders Can't Afford to Be Just 'Left-Brained'
Bill Bradley, SVP, Cyber Engineering and Technical Services, CenturyLink,  10/17/2017
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
Enterprises are spending more of their IT budgets on cybersecurity technology. How do your organization's security plans and strategies compare to what others are doing? Here's an in-depth look.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.