Endpoint

6/19/2015
04:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

US Hosts The Most Botnet Servers

More malicious command and control servers are based in the US than anywhere else, and China is home to the most bots.

The United States leads the world in hosting malicious servers that are used to remotely command and control infected user machines and systems. And the US is the second-most frequent target of those systems, a new report from Level 3 Communications shows.

Level 3 monitored communications between some 1,000 command-and-control servers (C2) and their victims earlier this year to get a better sense of botnet behavior and to examine the potential causes for an increase in the use of botnets in denial of service attacks, data theft, and other malicious activities.

It found that 60% of C2 servers are being used for malicious communications targeting corporate networks. Left unchecked, such C2s have the potential to disrupt businesses and destroy their data assets, Level 3 said.

Level 3 observed botnets being used for malware distribution and phishing services a well as the usual distributed denial-of-service mission. On average, each botnet had 1,700 infected hosts and stayed up for about 38 days before being taken down voluntarily by the criminals themselves or by the service provider. The number of victims per C2 server meanwhile has gone down substantially from a peak of 3,763 in January to 338 in March. Much of that has to do with the increased vigilance displayed by the security industry against the botnet threat, Level 3 said.

From an infrastructure use standpoint, threat actors seem to be taking a page from their enterprise counterparts in using cloud technologies to host their malware tools. Many have begun spinning up virtual machines via legitimate infrastructure-as-a-service providers to host and distribute their malware tools. The relatively limited validation that cloud providers do when provisioning service to new accounts has made it easy for threat actors to subscribe to cloud services, according to Level 3.

The biggest proportion of C2 traffic and most of the victims were from within the United States. But that’s only because the US has a network infrastructure that is highly suitable for botnet operators.

"Geographies with robust communications infrastructures are fertile soil for C2s," says Chris Richter, senior vice president of Managed Security Services for Level 3. "These locations also happen to be in close global proximity to rich industrial and public sector targets for cybercriminals and rogue nation-state actors," he says.

China, meanwhile, which has been accused by US authorities of being behind numerous attacks against American companies and government organizations, is also one of the biggest botnet victims. During the first quarter of 2015, Level 3 counted 532,000 unique IP addresses in China that were being controlled by C2 systems, compared to about 528,000 systems in the US. Other countries with a relatively high number of victims were Norway, Spain, and Ukraine.

"Tracking the threat purpose of a C2 is key because this data can serve as a predictor of risk," the Level 3 report said. "It is important to be able to determine if your servers are communicating with botnets that are operationalized to function in specific purposes, so that you can react to stop the threat."

In many cases, mitigating a threat might involve something as simply as blocking email from infected endpoints to prevent phishing.

"Level 3 published this report to raise awareness of what organizations should expect from their network service providers," Richter says. The report highlights the need for greater levels of partnership and collaboration across the security community for dealing with the botnet threat, he says.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Crowdsourced vs. Traditional Pen Testing
Alex Haynes, Chief Information Security Officer, CDL,  3/19/2019
BEC Scammer Pleads Guilty
Dark Reading Staff 3/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Well, at least it isn't Mobby Dick!
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
Organizations are responding to new threats with new processes for detecting and mitigating them. Here's a look at how the discipline of incident response is evolving.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-4035
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
IBM Content Navigator 3.0CD could allow attackers to direct web traffic to a malicious site. If attackers make a fake IBM Content Navigator site, they can send a link to ICN users to send request to their Edit client directly. Then Edit client will download documents from the fake ICN website. IBM X...
CVE-2019-4052
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
IBM API Connect 2018.1 and 2018.4.1.2 apis can be leveraged by unauthenticated users to discover login ids of registered users. IBM X-Force ID: 156544.
CVE-2019-9648
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
An issue was discovered in the SFTP Server component in Core FTP 2.0 Build 674. A directory traversal vulnerability exists using the SIZE command along with a \..\..\ substring, allowing an attacker to enumerate file existence based on the returned information.
CVE-2019-9923
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
pax_decode_header in sparse.c in GNU Tar before 1.32 had a NULL pointer dereference when parsing certain archives that have malformed extended headers.
CVE-2019-9924
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
rbash in Bash before 4.4-beta2 did not prevent the shell user from modifying BASH_CMDS, thus allowing the user to execute any command with the permissions of the shell.