Endpoint

4/28/2017
11:30 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Ransomware Payout Doesn't Pay Off

About 40% of small- and midsized businesses hit with ransomware paid their attackers, but less than half got their information back.

Ransomware, ironically, is a crime based on trust. Victims pay attackers who compromise their data with an expectation it will be returned to them.

Unfortunately, a growing number of ransomware targets pay thousands of dollars to get their data back, but receive nothing. This was the most surprising result to come from a Bitdefender survey of 250 IT pros working in small and medium businesses (SMBs), says senior threat analyst Bogdan Botezatu.

The survey, conducted by Spiceworks, discovered one in five SMBs was hit with a ransomware attack within the past 12 months. Of the 20% targeted, 38% paid attackers an average of $2,423 to release their data. Less than half (45%) got their information back.

"Until now, ransomware was a business where honesty was key," Botezatu explains. "Everyone paid the ransom expecting they would get their data back … the ransomware space is continuously changing. Honor among criminals is no longer there."

He says this reflects a broader trend across cybercrime as attackers' boundaries change. Many used to avoid healthcare attacks because they could potentially harm patients. Now, healthcare organizations are frequently targeted, and lack the tech and best practices to defend themselves.

Similarly, SMBs represent a growing pool of victims as attackers seek weaker targets. Ransomware had mostly hit consumers until now, says Botezatu. Businesses weren't targeted as often because cybercriminals likely knew about their strong security tools and data backups. 

"They're not going to the consumer or enterprise that much," he continues. "They found their sweet spot in the middle."

Researchers found SMBs are appealing targets for ransomware because they handle the same sensitive business information (customer data, financial records, product info) as larger organizations, but lack the strong security measures to protect it.

Attackers know they're more likely to receive payment from SMBs, which have more sensitive data than consumers. An individual may be willing to pay about $1,000 for ransomed files. A business with hundreds of customers will pay far more because they need that information, Botezatu says.

Email, cited by 77% of SMBs, is the most popular vector of attack. Cybercriminals use email to compel victims to open or download attachments, or click malicious links, reported 56% and 54% of SMBs, respectively. Nearly one-third (31%) of attacks occurred via social engineering.

"This is serious," says Botezatu. "Whatever you do, you cannot block email in a company - and hackers have a wide assortment of file extensions they can squeeze ransomware into."

Most SMBs hit with ransomware attacks were able to mitigate the attack by restoring data from backup (65%), or through security software or practices (52%). One-quarter of those targeted could not find a solution to address the problem and lost their data as a result.

Botezatu advises SMBs to "strongly consider" complementing their security strategy with a backup security solution. Ransomware is a highly volatile type of attack, he explains, and it only needs to run once to be effective. Criminals don't need to be persistent to encrypt all your data.

If you are attacked? "Don't pay up," he says. "Try to do without the data."

An attack should serve as a lesson learned, he continues. If people continue paying to get their information, ransomware attacks will continue as a means of easy money for cybercriminals. While Botezatu thinks ransomware is here to stay, he urges victims to avoid paying up.

"Every payment you make keeps the ecosystem alive," he emphasizes.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Higher Education: 15 Books to Help Cybersecurity Pros Be Better
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  12/12/2018
'PowerSnitch' Hacks Androids via Power Banks
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/8/2018
Worst Password Blunders of 2018 Hit Organizations East and West
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  12/12/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: camera, camera everywhere, not a single news to rely on
Current Issue
10 Best Practices That Could Reshape Your IT Security Department
This Dark Reading Tech Digest, explores ten best practices that could reshape IT security departments.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14623
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-14
A SQL injection flaw was found in katello's errata-related API. An authenticated remote attacker can craft input data to force a malformed SQL query to the backend database, which will leak internal IDs. This is issue is related to an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-3072. Version 3.10 and older is vulne...
CVE-2018-18093
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-14
Improper file permissions in the installer for Intel VTune Amplifier 2018 Update 3 and before may allow unprivileged user to potentially gain privileged access via local access.
CVE-2018-18096
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-14
Improper memory handling in Intel QuickAssist Technology for Linux (all versions) may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable a denial of service via local access.
CVE-2018-18097
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-14
Improper directory permissions in Intel Solid State Drive Toolbox before 3.5.7 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2018-3704
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-14
Improper directory permissions in the installer for the Intel Parallel Studio before 2019 Gold may allow authenticated users to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.