Endpoint
6/3/2014
05:00 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

A Peek Inside Enterprise BYOD App Security Policies

IBM company Fiberlink shares data on how enterprises are pushing and securing mobile apps.

The average BYOD device's apps contain nearly 40% custom enterprise mobile apps, according to new data culled from IBM company Fiberlink's mobile customers.

Jonathan Dale, director of marketing for IBM's mobile subsidiary, says the firm's data reflects the increase in organizations building or customizing apps for their users' mobile devices. Some are layering in security policies with those apps, he says.

"That could be as simple as before the app grants the user access to the information they need, they perform an extra authentication -- to Active Directory or to an encrypted container on the device," says Dale. Fiberlink provided the following data to Dark Reading.

Some 35% of employees have between 25 and 49 apps on their mobile devices; 25% have between 50 and 99; 18% have between 10 and 24; 17% have less than 10; and 5% have a whopping 100+ apps on their devices, according to data gathered by Fiberlink.

Organizations push 15,000 different apps to their employees' mobile devices, 62% of which are publicly available apps, and 38% of which are custom apps from in-house. Some 77% of the devices are Apple iOS, followed by 22% Android and 1% Windows.

Dale says he was surprised to see that 41% of the mobile apps are automatically removed if a "selective remote wipe" is executed on a lost or stolen device. "I was a little surprised that was not higher," he says.

The good news from the data is many of these organizations are instituting some security policy with the mobile apps. "Another popular security feature is the ability to restrict data movement from that [mobile] app to other apps," he says, which can help reduce data leakage, for instance.

Containerization of enterprise data is becoming a best-practice: "It's becoming more popular when creating apps and putting in policies that you can only cut-and-paste with apps only within your secure container."

Among the most popular public mobile apps enterprises are deploying for their mobile workforces: Adobe Reader, Google Maps, iBooks, Cisco AnyConnect, Dropbox, Evernote, Google Earth, and Pages.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
6/4/2014 | 7:33:06 AM
Re: A Peek Inside Enterprise BYOD App Security Policies, by Kelly Jackson Higgins
It was interesting to see the data on the breakdown and types of apps IT is pushing to users' mobile devices. And it was promising to see that some really are starting to protect corporate data access. IBM's Dale said he was surprised to see Cisco AnyConnect show up as a popular public app, mainly because there are ways to streamline the VPN connection within apps. I thought it seemed promising to have IT pushing a VPN app.
James ArnoldW608
50%
50%
James ArnoldW608,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/3/2014 | 5:50:15 PM
A Peek Inside Enterprise BYOD App Security Policies, by Kelly Jackson Higgins
A very good analysis of the security challenge with BYOD.  Imagine "one" piece of data going  through such a multitude of authentication and verification procedures, without being altered in some way.  http://www.darkreading.com/endpoint/a-peek-inside-enterprise-byod-app-security-policies/d/d-id/1269404?_mc=sm_dr
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading Must Reads - September 25, 2014
Dark Reading's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of identity and access management. Learn about access control in the age of HTML5, how to improve authentication, why Active Directory is dead, and more.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2012-5485
Published: 2014-09-30
registerConfiglet.py in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1 allows remote attackers to execute Python code via unspecified vectors, related to the admin interface.

CVE-2012-5486
Published: 2014-09-30
ZPublisher.HTTPRequest._scrubHeader in Zope 2 before 2.13.19, as used in Plone before 4.3 beta 1, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers via a linefeed (LF) character.

CVE-2012-5487
Published: 2014-09-30
The sandbox whitelisting function (allowmodule.py) in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1 allows remote authenticated users with certain privileges to bypass the Python sandbox restriction and execute arbitrary Python code via vectors related to importing.

CVE-2012-5488
Published: 2014-09-30
python_scripts.py in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1 allows remote attackers to execute Python code via a crafted URL, related to createObject.

CVE-2012-5489
Published: 2014-09-30
The App.Undo.UndoSupport.get_request_var_or_attr function in Zope before 2.12.21 and 3.13.x before 2.13.11, as used in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1, allows remote authenticated users to gain access to restricted attributes via unspecified vectors.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
In our next Dark Reading Radio broadcast, we’ll take a close look at some of the latest research and practices in application security.