Quick Hits
News
NewsQuick HitsNews
CommentaryQuick Hits
News
CommentaryNewsNews
CommentaryQuick HitsQuick HitsNewsNewsNews
This article brings back memories of numerous discussions from 15-20 years ago about how to adhere to the SDLC in the fast paced world of the Internet. I'm not truely sure we ever came up with a solution for that either,...
In reply to: New Problem same discussion
If a thief takes a physical thing - car, wallet, jewelry, etc --- then that can be defined with a serial number and such and retrieved, also with a hard currency value for the loss. DATA is somehing else and to a...
In reply to: One real question ... Thefr of "what" exactly
" An actor may wait weeks or months or have to dig through the 143 million stolen from Equifax before action is indeed taken" I would agree, otherwise why attack in the first place, they will eventually use it what they...
In reply to: Re: Based on outcome
"lack of evidence that attackers maliciously used the data in question but is there a statute of limitation for instances like this?" This would be a good question to ask, they may not have used it yet, that does not mean...
In reply to: Re: Based on outcome
"Equifax should not be allowed to continue as a business"
I think there should be consequence for them, we are not sue how secure other two credit status firms's network.
In reply to: Re: Interesting
"This is a common probelm, the judiciary does not understand technology and they consequently make idiotic rulings based on that lack of understanding." That makes sense. It would be hard to find a judge who understands...
In reply to: Re: Interesting
" a precedent that Equifax will surely jump on to ward off the class action suits against them."
That would be my guess too. This will be a long legal battle I would guess.
In reply to: Re: Interesting
"The answer to your question is WHO was guarding the vault? Who has responsibility for the vault?"
I would say that is the organization itself. Data maybe in all over the network, no breach should have happened.
In reply to: Re: Information vs Money
"information theft is invisible if compared to car or money theft"
That makes sense however data/information is value to the owners of that, and stolen so there should be consequence on that.
In reply to: Re: Information vs Money
"If a thief steals your money you don't have to prove they spent it only that they stole it. "
That makes sense, I wonder where the judge is coming from. Very strange decision.
In reply to: Re: Information vs Money
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next WaveJust when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
The Dark Reading Security Spending Survey
Enterprises are spending an unprecedented amount of money on IT security — where does it all go? In this survey, Dark Reading polled senior IT management on security budgets and spending plans, and their priorities for the coming year. Download the report and find out what they had to say.
Tweet This
