News
4/6/2010
12:15 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

What Is Zero Detect?

There is a term you are going to start hearing more of in storage circles; Zero Detect. Some storage systems that offer thin provisioning are adding the ability to detect areas of a volume that have been zeroed out so they can reclaim that space and use it elsewhere. Zero detect becomes a critical component as we advance the capabilities of thin provisioning.

There is a term you are going to start hearing more of in storage circles; Zero Detect. Some storage systems that offer thin provisioning are adding the ability to detect areas of a volume that have been zeroed out so they can reclaim that space and use it elsewhere. Zero detect becomes a critical component as we advance the capabilities of thin provisioning.Most file systems when they are told to delete a file, simply mark the area as available to be overwritten, they don't actually remove anything. This creates a challenge for storage systems that offer thin provisioning. If you delete a large amount of data to free up capacity, the thin provisioning system will not be able to understand what happened and reclaim that capacity. The result is that overtime thin provisioned systems used to "gain weight" as files were deleted from the file system. In other words the thinly provisioned volumes most efficient day was its first.

Despite this shortcoming, thin provisioning has caught on, almost becoming a required feature. The ability to only allocate capacity as it was needed, even if you could not later reclaim that capacity, still saves many organizations lots of wasted capacity. The ideal situation is to be able to reclaim the deleted space as well and the next era of thin provisioning will be defined by vendors that can advance the state of the art to address this challenge.

Which brings us to zero detect. As I said earlier a file system does not automatically zero out deleted blocks. It just marks them available to be overwritten. A separate utility will have to be run that will scan the file system for deleted files and then zero them out. Once thats done the zero detect aware thin provisioning system can scan the volume and identify the blocks that have been zero'ed out and reclaim those areas. While this adds a few extra tasks to the storage administrator's todo list, imagine being able to reclaim TB's of capacity. This will likely become a housekeeping chore that is run once a week or month but the return could be well worth the investment in time.

Zero detect does let a few worms sneak out of the can though. There will be issues with how many consecutive blocks of deletion are available before the space can be reclaimed and all of this scanning is going to take processing power on both the attached server and especially on the storage system. Storage system suppliers will have to come up with ways to address at least the later.

The ideal solution may be to have a file system that is thin aware and communicates directly with the storage systems. This would allow the storage systems to reclaim the space as soon as it becomes available. The communication would eliminate the need for a separate maintenance process as well as reduce the impact on server and storage processors.

There is an effort within the Technical Committee T11, which is the committee within INCITS to produce a standard interface between file systems and thin provisioned storage systems. Until this standard becomes ratified and established it is going to be on the file system vendors and storage hardware vendors to work together. Until that time though the zero detect method may be the only way to enable thin reclamation.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-6501
Published: 2015-03-30
The default soap.wsdl_cache_dir setting in (1) php.ini-production and (2) php.ini-development in PHP through 5.6.7 specifies the /tmp directory, which makes it easier for local users to conduct WSDL injection attacks by creating a file under /tmp with a predictable filename that is used by the get_s...

CVE-2014-9652
Published: 2015-03-30
The mconvert function in softmagic.c in file before 5.21, as used in the Fileinfo component in PHP before 5.4.37, 5.5.x before 5.5.21, and 5.6.x before 5.6.5, does not properly handle a certain string-length field during a copy of a truncated version of a Pascal string, which might allow remote atta...

CVE-2014-9653
Published: 2015-03-30
readelf.c in file before 5.22, as used in the Fileinfo component in PHP before 5.4.37, 5.5.x before 5.5.21, and 5.6.x before 5.6.5, does not consider that pread calls sometimes read only a subset of the available data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (uninitialized memory ...

CVE-2014-9705
Published: 2015-03-30
Heap-based buffer overflow in the enchant_broker_request_dict function in ext/enchant/enchant.c in PHP before 5.4.38, 5.5.x before 5.5.22, and 5.6.x before 5.6.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors that trigger creation of multiple dictionaries.

CVE-2014-9709
Published: 2015-03-30
The GetCode_ function in gd_gif_in.c in GD 2.1.1 and earlier, as used in PHP before 5.5.21 and 5.6.x before 5.6.5, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read and application crash) via a crafted GIF image that is improperly handled by the gdImageCreateFromGif function.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Good hackers--aka security researchers--are worried about the possible legal and professional ramifications of President Obama's new proposed crackdown on cyber criminals.