News
10/21/2009
03:43 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Understanding Hard Drive Performance

In the last performance entries we discussed understanding storage bandwidth and understanding storage controllers. Next up is to understand the performance characteristics of the hard drive itself and how the mechanical hard drive can be the performance bottleneck.

In the last performance entries we discussed understanding storage bandwidth and understanding storage controllers. Next up is to understand the performance characteristics of the hard drive itself and how the mechanical hard drive can be the performance bottleneck.The big problem with hard drives is that they are stuck from a performance perspective. While everything else has increased in speed over the past few years, the fastest hard drives have been locked in at 15K RPM. What has kept mechanical drives viable in performance concerned data centers is the ability to group multiple drives together in an array group. Each drive in the array can respond to storage I/O requests. As long as you have enough requests, also known as queue depth, every time you add a drive to an array group performance improves.

The downside to large drive count array groups is that you often run into wasted capacity because so many drives are added to hit the performance requirement that the application can't use all the capacity that came along with the drive. Companies like 3PAR, Xiotech and Isilon get around this by performing fine grain virtualization, meaning they can stripe all the data from all the attached servers across all or most of the available drives in the storage system. This technique, known as wide striping, for many organizations strikes a balance between high performance and efficient capacity utilization.

At some point however you have a situation where you have added so many drives that it is not cost effective to do so or you run out of storage I/O requests and you have a response time or latency issue. The only step left is to speed up the drive itself.

Where are 20K RPM drives? While 20K RPM hard drives have been researched by various vendors, they have not been found to be viable for the market. There are problems with the heat, vibration and reliability issues with these faster drives. Cost is also an issue with 20K RPM hard drives. In fact they may be more expensive than an equivalent capacity Solid State Disk (SSD). For reasons we state in "SSD's are cost effective NOW", the downward price trend on SSDs seems to have eliminated the development of the 20K RPM drive market. With SSD you get better performance with none of the heat and vibration issues that were set to plague 20K drives. Finally SSDs, especially enterprise class SSD using SLC Flash, have proven to be as reliable as mechanical drives.

For many environments drive performance is not an issue and a simple array group of 10K or even 7.5K RPM drives provides all the performance their applications need. As performance becomes an issue, and storage controller and bandwidth issues are eliminated, then adding drive count is the next logical step, especially if you can leverage technologies like fine grain virtualization. Eventually the final stop is SSD.

Even in SSD their is likely to be tiers of service and you will want to use different SSD technologies for different SSD classes.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading, September 16, 2014
Malicious software is morphing to be more targeted, stealthy, and destructive. Are you prepared to stop it?
Flash Poll
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Considering how prevalent third-party attacks are, we need to ask hard questions about how partners and suppliers are safeguarding systems and data.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2006-1318
Published: 2014-09-19
Microsoft Office 2003 SP1 and SP2, Office XP SP3, Office 2000 SP3, Office 2004 for Mac, and Office X for Mac do not properly parse record lengths, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed control in an Office document, aka "Microsoft Office Control Vulnerability."

CVE-2014-1391
Published: 2014-09-19
QT Media Foundation in Apple OS X before 10.9.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted movie file with RLE encoding.

CVE-2014-4350
Published: 2014-09-19
Buffer overflow in QT Media Foundation in Apple OS X before 10.9.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted MIDI file.

CVE-2014-4376
Published: 2014-09-19
IOKit in IOAcceleratorFamily in Apple OS X before 10.9.5 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code in a privileged context or cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) via an application that provides crafted API arguments.

CVE-2014-4390
Published: 2014-09-19
Bluetooth in Apple OS X before 10.9.5 does not properly validate API calls, which allows attackers to execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via a crafted application.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio