News
7/27/2010
05:10 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Making Storage Management Easier

As we discussed in our last entry no matter how easy the storage protocol or storage system you select at some point someone is going to have to interact with the storage itself. It may be a problem that needs to be resolved or it may be a need to provision a new server but something will come up. In most mid-sized data centers managing storage is no one's full time job. It is something that is dealt with

As we discussed in our last entry no matter how easy the storage protocol or storage system you select at some point someone is going to have to interact with the storage itself. It may be a problem that needs to be resolved or it may be a need to provision a new server but something will come up. In most mid-sized data centers managing storage is no one's full time job. It is something that is dealt with as the situation arises. This interrupt driven style of storage management is not ideal but it is reality.The goal of the interrupt driven storage manager is to solve the problem and then get back to their real job as fast as possible. We find that there are two steps that can be taken that can help accomplish this goal. In this entry we will discuss the first step which deals with system selection and the second is selecting the right management tool, which we will discuss in an upcoming entry.

Most decision makers when selecting a storage solution will consider ease of implementation, ease of expansion and ease of operation, all of which are very important to keeping storage management time to a minimum. One consideration that seems to often be overlooked is how far will the system take you? Meaning if the organization grows and expands when will you need new or additional storage systems for IT to help support that growth? You don't want to be in a situation where you have five or six separate storage systems supporting the business. If you do storage will almost certainly become a full time job by potentially multiple people.

Look instead for either a system that has all the capacity and performance you are going to need to cover the next few years of storage demands either by having that capability built in up front or one that can be expanded to meet those future demands. This does not mean having a collection of separate storage systems that can all be managed by some sort of unifying application that the vendor provides. Most of these provide a unified view but individual operations means managing and configuring each individual storage system.

For many mid-sized or smaller data centers consolidating to one storage system is a reasonable goal. For some mid-sized and larger data centers covering all your storage needs with one system may not be feasible. Not every system can do everything. However, keeping the number of systems to two or three, at the most, should be achievable for all but the very largest data centers.

The payback of having one system, assuming it meets the other criteria of implementation and operation ease, is less time managing storage. When troubleshooting a problem, looking for available capacity for that new VM or deciding which file server that new user should be attached to, if there is only one place to look it becomes a very simple decision.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-6477
Published: 2014-11-23
Unspecified vulnerability in the JPublisher component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-4290, CVE-2014-4291, CVE-2014-4292, CVE-2014-4...

CVE-2014-4807
Published: 2014-11-22
Sterling Order Management in IBM Sterling Selling and Fulfillment Suite 9.3.0 before FP8 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a '\0' character.

CVE-2014-6183
Published: 2014-11-22
IBM Security Network Protection 5.1 before 5.1.0.0 FP13, 5.1.1 before 5.1.1.0 FP8, 5.1.2 before 5.1.2.0 FP9, 5.1.2.1 before FP5, 5.2 before 5.2.0.0 FP5, and 5.3 before 5.3.0.0 FP1 on XGS devices allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-8626
Published: 2014-11-22
Stack-based buffer overflow in the date_from_ISO8601 function in ext/xmlrpc/libxmlrpc/xmlrpc.c in PHP before 5.2.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by including a timezone field in a date, leading to improper XML-RPC encoding...

CVE-2014-8710
Published: 2014-11-22
The decompress_sigcomp_message function in epan/sigcomp-udvm.c in the SigComp UDVM dissector in Wireshark 1.10.x before 1.10.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read and application crash) via a crafted packet.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?