News
11/24/2008
10:13 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

IT Efficiency, First Demand Oversight

In this era of tightening budgets, storage administrators are once again being asked to do more with less. The problem is that for most data centers, the efficiency crank has been turned several times already and the easy efficiency steps already have been taken.

In this era of tightening budgets, storage administrators are once again being asked to do more with less. The problem is that for most data centers, the efficiency crank has been turned several times already and the easy efficiency steps already have been taken.Two examples of those easy steps are server virtualization and storage consolidation. Most organizations already have done a phase one virtualization; basically, many of the noncritical servers have been virtualized. In a similar fashion, many organizations have consolidated storage; this amounts to keeping the direct attached model and its limitations but not really leveraging the full potential and efficiencies of shared storage. In future entries in the IT efficiency series we will dive deep into these subjects.

The very first step in improving IT efficiency is to demand oversight. In the world of storage and virtualization, this means demand command and control of the environment. Demand a tool that will give you a visual view of the environment both in real time and a historical view. The reason this is critical is that to increase efficiency there are two components that must be available at the outset. First, it's the ability to know what you have, and the second is the ability to know where you have been, so you can measure and prove success.

These tools are available from the larger storage manufacturers like EMC, HP, and NetApp, but make sure that their tools will cover more than just their own, or a select number of third-party storage vendors. There are companies like Tek-Tools, Akorri, and Monosphere that are independent companies and by their nature can provide a more neutral application for this purpose.

Sometimes a concern with standardizing on an independent software solution is support from the storage hardware manufacturer. What we have seen repeatedly is that selection of one of these tools and strict insistence on support of it causes the hardware manufacturers to quickly fall in line and provide support. Some will even begin to offer advanced support to capture a competitive edge in your data center. This isn't a time where storage manufacturers can sustain a customer loss based on lack of support of software application. The knowledge of how the storage network interrelates to the virtualized server environment also is critical. The ability to see what storage is assigned to which virtual machine or physical host is critical in allocating future systems as well as trouble-shooting problems that may arise.

Understanding what you have, especially in a virtual environment, is a critical first step in identifying areas within your infrastructure that can save IT budget dollars or at least optimize the infrastructure for the economic realities of the day. Tools that can give you a view of what you have, what you have too much of, and what you need more of will help you prioritize those budget dollars correctly.

Join us for our upcoming Webcast on Improving IT Efficiency.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-0192
Published: 2015-07-02
Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1, 7 R1 before SR2 FP11, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine.

CVE-2015-1914
Published: 2015-07-02
IBM Java 7 R1 before SR3, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to bypass "permission checks" and obtain sensitive information via vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine.

CVE-2015-1916
Published: 2015-07-02
Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unknown vectors related to SSL/TLS and the Secure Socket Extension provider.

CVE-2015-3157
Published: 2015-07-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.

CVE-2015-3202
Published: 2015-07-02
fusermount in FUSE before 2.9.3-15 does not properly clear the environment before invoking (1) mount or (2) umount as root, which allows local users to write to arbitrary files via a crafted LIBMOUNT_MTAB environment variable that is used by mount's debugging feature.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Marc Spitler, co-author of the Verizon DBIR will share some of the lesser-known but most intriguing tidbits from the massive report