News
11/24/2008
10:13 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

IT Efficiency, First Demand Oversight

In this era of tightening budgets, storage administrators are once again being asked to do more with less. The problem is that for most data centers, the efficiency crank has been turned several times already and the easy efficiency steps already have been taken.

In this era of tightening budgets, storage administrators are once again being asked to do more with less. The problem is that for most data centers, the efficiency crank has been turned several times already and the easy efficiency steps already have been taken.Two examples of those easy steps are server virtualization and storage consolidation. Most organizations already have done a phase one virtualization; basically, many of the noncritical servers have been virtualized. In a similar fashion, many organizations have consolidated storage; this amounts to keeping the direct attached model and its limitations but not really leveraging the full potential and efficiencies of shared storage. In future entries in the IT efficiency series we will dive deep into these subjects.

The very first step in improving IT efficiency is to demand oversight. In the world of storage and virtualization, this means demand command and control of the environment. Demand a tool that will give you a visual view of the environment both in real time and a historical view. The reason this is critical is that to increase efficiency there are two components that must be available at the outset. First, it's the ability to know what you have, and the second is the ability to know where you have been, so you can measure and prove success.

These tools are available from the larger storage manufacturers like EMC, HP, and NetApp, but make sure that their tools will cover more than just their own, or a select number of third-party storage vendors. There are companies like Tek-Tools, Akorri, and Monosphere that are independent companies and by their nature can provide a more neutral application for this purpose.

Sometimes a concern with standardizing on an independent software solution is support from the storage hardware manufacturer. What we have seen repeatedly is that selection of one of these tools and strict insistence on support of it causes the hardware manufacturers to quickly fall in line and provide support. Some will even begin to offer advanced support to capture a competitive edge in your data center. This isn't a time where storage manufacturers can sustain a customer loss based on lack of support of software application. The knowledge of how the storage network interrelates to the virtualized server environment also is critical. The ability to see what storage is assigned to which virtual machine or physical host is critical in allocating future systems as well as trouble-shooting problems that may arise.

Understanding what you have, especially in a virtual environment, is a critical first step in identifying areas within your infrastructure that can save IT budget dollars or at least optimize the infrastructure for the economic realities of the day. Tools that can give you a view of what you have, what you have too much of, and what you need more of will help you prioritize those budget dollars correctly.

Join us for our upcoming Webcast on Improving IT Efficiency.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-5426
Published: 2014-11-27
MatrikonOPC OPC Server for DNP3 1.2.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (unhandled exception and DNP3 process crash) via a crafted message.

CVE-2014-2037
Published: 2014-11-26
Openswan 2.6.40 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and IKE daemon restart) via IKEv2 packets that lack expected payloads. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE 2013-6466.

CVE-2014-6609
Published: 2014-11-26
The res_pjsip_pubsub module in Asterisk Open Source 12.x before 12.5.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted headers in a SIP SUBSCRIBE request for an event package.

CVE-2014-6610
Published: 2014-11-26
Asterisk Open Source 11.x before 11.12.1 and 12.x before 12.5.1 and Certified Asterisk 11.6 before 11.6-cert6, when using the res_fax_spandsp module, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via an out of call message, which is not properly handled in the ReceiveFax dia...

CVE-2014-7141
Published: 2014-11-26
The pinger in Squid 3.x before 3.4.8 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and crash) via a crafted type in an (1) ICMP or (2) ICMP6 packet.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?