News
11/24/2008
10:13 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

IT Efficiency, First Demand Oversight

In this era of tightening budgets, storage administrators are once again being asked to do more with less. The problem is that for most data centers, the efficiency crank has been turned several times already and the easy efficiency steps already have been taken.

In this era of tightening budgets, storage administrators are once again being asked to do more with less. The problem is that for most data centers, the efficiency crank has been turned several times already and the easy efficiency steps already have been taken.Two examples of those easy steps are server virtualization and storage consolidation. Most organizations already have done a phase one virtualization; basically, many of the noncritical servers have been virtualized. In a similar fashion, many organizations have consolidated storage; this amounts to keeping the direct attached model and its limitations but not really leveraging the full potential and efficiencies of shared storage. In future entries in the IT efficiency series we will dive deep into these subjects.

The very first step in improving IT efficiency is to demand oversight. In the world of storage and virtualization, this means demand command and control of the environment. Demand a tool that will give you a visual view of the environment both in real time and a historical view. The reason this is critical is that to increase efficiency there are two components that must be available at the outset. First, it's the ability to know what you have, and the second is the ability to know where you have been, so you can measure and prove success.

These tools are available from the larger storage manufacturers like EMC, HP, and NetApp, but make sure that their tools will cover more than just their own, or a select number of third-party storage vendors. There are companies like Tek-Tools, Akorri, and Monosphere that are independent companies and by their nature can provide a more neutral application for this purpose.

Sometimes a concern with standardizing on an independent software solution is support from the storage hardware manufacturer. What we have seen repeatedly is that selection of one of these tools and strict insistence on support of it causes the hardware manufacturers to quickly fall in line and provide support. Some will even begin to offer advanced support to capture a competitive edge in your data center. This isn't a time where storage manufacturers can sustain a customer loss based on lack of support of software application. The knowledge of how the storage network interrelates to the virtualized server environment also is critical. The ability to see what storage is assigned to which virtual machine or physical host is critical in allocating future systems as well as trouble-shooting problems that may arise.

Understanding what you have, especially in a virtual environment, is a critical first step in identifying areas within your infrastructure that can save IT budget dollars or at least optimize the infrastructure for the economic realities of the day. Tools that can give you a view of what you have, what you have too much of, and what you need more of will help you prioritize those budget dollars correctly.

Join us for our upcoming Webcast on Improving IT Efficiency.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-4233
Published: 2015-07-02
SQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.2) allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCuu54037.

CVE-2014-1750
Published: 2015-07-01
Open redirect vulnerability in nokia-mapsplaces.php in the Nokia Maps & Places plugin 1.6.6 for WordPress allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the href parameter to page/place.html. NOTE: this was originally reported as cross-sit...

CVE-2014-1836
Published: 2015-07-01
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in htdocs/libraries/image-editor/image-edit.php in ImpressCMS before 1.3.6 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a full pathname in the image_path parameter in a cancel action.

CVE-2015-0848
Published: 2015-07-01
Heap-based buffer overflow in libwmf 0.2.8.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted BMP image.

CVE-2015-1330
Published: 2015-07-01
unattended-upgrades before 0.86.1 does not properly authenticate packages when the (1) force-confold or (2) force-confnew dpkg options are enabled in the DPkg::Options::* apt configuration, which allows remote man-in-the-middle attackers to upload and execute arbitrary packages via unspecified vecto...

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Marc Spitler, co-author of the Verizon DBIR will share some of the lesser-known but most intriguing tidbits from the massive report