News
1/4/2010
10:48 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Four Tiers For The New Decade

The storage component is changing, becoming either dramatically faster with Solid State Disk (SSD) technology or fundamentally more cost effective thanks to capacity-efficient disk archiving or overhead-efficient cloud storage. In addition all current storage will still need to be managed. A four-tier storage strategy will allow storage managers to develop a storage environment that is both cost efficient and meets increasing performance demands.

The storage component is changing, becoming either dramatically faster with Solid State Disk (SSD) technology or fundamentally more cost effective thanks to capacity-efficient disk archiving or overhead-efficient cloud storage. In addition all current storage will still need to be managed. A four-tier storage strategy will allow storage managers to develop a storage environment that is both cost efficient and meets increasing performance demands.Ironically the last decade kicked off with the coming of SATA drive technology and the idea of tiered storage and, dare I say it, ILM (Information Lifecycle Management). While the initiatives had merit, part of what doomed them to failure was a lack of need by IT. Now however things have changed. The rapid growth of unstructured data (data not in a database) in most organizations in requiring longer and more managed retention. At the same time database applications as well as applications with incredibly high user counts thanks to web 2.0 are causing performance problems. Finally the unabated rollout of server virtualization is moving operating system data to the SAN or NAS to leverage the flexibility that a virtualized server environment can bring.

As I mentioned earlier there is also a more dramatic difference in the tiers of storage available now. SSD is exponentially faster but also somewhat more expensive. If the investment is made in SSD you want to make sure the right data is on that tier for the right amount of time; while it is immediately active. At the other end of the spectrum is archive storage designed to be cost effective, scalable, capacity optimized and power efficient. Finally cloud storage as an archive has a role to play as possibly the even longer term or permanent resting ground for data. Somewhere in the middle of SSD and Archive are traditional SAS based mechanical drives that will store near-active data or, as we discuss in our Visual SSD Readiness Guide, data from applications that can't benefit from SSD's speed.

With four tiers of storage available to the storage manager that each have their own justifiable differentiations, the missing ingredient is how to decide which set of data should go where? Should this be a manual process or is this something that should be automated? Over the next several entries we will examine some of the options available to storage managers and how they might help them develop a four tier storage strategy that maximizes cost, performance and reliability.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading Must Reads - September 25, 2014
Dark Reading's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of identity and access management. Learn about access control in the age of HTML5, how to improve authentication, why Active Directory is dead, and more.
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2012-5619
Published: 2014-09-29
The Sleuth Kit (TSK) 4.0.1 does not properly handle "." (dotfile) file system entries in FAT file systems and other file systems for which . is not a reserved name, which allows local users to hide activities it more difficult to conduct forensics activities, as demonstrated by Flame.

CVE-2012-5621
Published: 2014-09-29
lib/engine/components/opal/opal-call.cpp in ekiga before 4.0.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via an OPAL connection with a party name that contains invalid UTF-8 strings.

CVE-2012-6107
Published: 2014-09-29
Apache Axis2/C does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

CVE-2012-6110
Published: 2014-09-29
bcron-exec in bcron before 0.10 does not close file descriptors associated with temporary files when running a cron job, which allows local users to modify job files and send spam messages by accessing an open file descriptor.

CVE-2013-1874
Published: 2014-09-29
Untrusted search path vulnerability in csi in Chicken before 4.8.2 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse .csirc in the current working directory.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
In our next Dark Reading Radio broadcast, we’ll take a close look at some of the latest research and practices in application security.