News
1/4/2010
10:48 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Four Tiers For The New Decade

The storage component is changing, becoming either dramatically faster with Solid State Disk (SSD) technology or fundamentally more cost effective thanks to capacity-efficient disk archiving or overhead-efficient cloud storage. In addition all current storage will still need to be managed. A four-tier storage strategy will allow storage managers to develop a storage environment that is both cost efficient and meets increasing performance demands.

The storage component is changing, becoming either dramatically faster with Solid State Disk (SSD) technology or fundamentally more cost effective thanks to capacity-efficient disk archiving or overhead-efficient cloud storage. In addition all current storage will still need to be managed. A four-tier storage strategy will allow storage managers to develop a storage environment that is both cost efficient and meets increasing performance demands.Ironically the last decade kicked off with the coming of SATA drive technology and the idea of tiered storage and, dare I say it, ILM (Information Lifecycle Management). While the initiatives had merit, part of what doomed them to failure was a lack of need by IT. Now however things have changed. The rapid growth of unstructured data (data not in a database) in most organizations in requiring longer and more managed retention. At the same time database applications as well as applications with incredibly high user counts thanks to web 2.0 are causing performance problems. Finally the unabated rollout of server virtualization is moving operating system data to the SAN or NAS to leverage the flexibility that a virtualized server environment can bring.

As I mentioned earlier there is also a more dramatic difference in the tiers of storage available now. SSD is exponentially faster but also somewhat more expensive. If the investment is made in SSD you want to make sure the right data is on that tier for the right amount of time; while it is immediately active. At the other end of the spectrum is archive storage designed to be cost effective, scalable, capacity optimized and power efficient. Finally cloud storage as an archive has a role to play as possibly the even longer term or permanent resting ground for data. Somewhere in the middle of SSD and Archive are traditional SAS based mechanical drives that will store near-active data or, as we discuss in our Visual SSD Readiness Guide, data from applications that can't benefit from SSD's speed.

With four tiers of storage available to the storage manager that each have their own justifiable differentiations, the missing ingredient is how to decide which set of data should go where? Should this be a manual process or is this something that should be automated? Over the next several entries we will examine some of the options available to storage managers and how they might help them develop a four tier storage strategy that maximizes cost, performance and reliability.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Cartoon
DevOps’ Impact on Application Security
DevOps’ Impact on Application Security
Managing the interdependency between software and infrastructure is a thorny challenge. Often, it’s a “developers are from Mars, systems engineers are from Venus” situation.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7392
Published: 2014-07-22
Gitlist allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a file name to Source/.

CVE-2014-2385
Published: 2014-07-22
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the web UI in Sophos Anti-Virus for Linux before 9.6.1 allow local users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) newListList:ExcludeFileOnExpression, (2) newListList:ExcludeFilesystems, or (3) newListList:ExcludeMountPaths parameter t...

CVE-2014-3518
Published: 2014-07-22
jmx-remoting.sar in JBoss Remoting, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JEAP) 5.2.0, Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5.3.1, Red Hat JBoss Portal Platform 5.2.2, and Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform 5.3.1, does not properly implement the JSR 160 specification, which allows remote attackers to exec...

CVE-2014-3530
Published: 2014-07-22
The org.picketlink.common.util.DocumentUtil.getDocumentBuilderFactory method in PicketLink, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 5.2.0 and 6.2.4, expands entity references, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary code and possibly have other unspecified impact via...

CVE-2014-4326
Published: 2014-07-22
Elasticsearch Logstash 1.0.14 through 1.4.x before 1.4.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted event in (1) zabbix.rb or (2) nagios_nsca.rb in outputs/.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Where do information security startups come from? More important, how can I tell a good one from a flash in the pan? Learn how to separate ITSec wheat from chaff in this episode.