Application Security
5/14/2010
11:00 AM
50%
50%

Facebook Adds Two Privacy Tools

Both tools have to do with stopping unknown devices from logging in to a user's Facebook account.

Following Thursday's quickly convened meeting to discuss user privacy concerns, Facebook has unveiled two tools designed to help protect account-holders from scammers and alert users to suspicious activity.

With one tool, users can elect to approve the devices they typically use to log-in and receive e-mail or text notifications. This feature would serve as an alert if another, unselected device is used to access the account.

"For example, you can save your home computer, your school or work computer, and your mobile phone. Once you've done this, whenever someone logs in to your account from a device not on this list, we'll ask the person to name the device," wrote Lev Popov, a software engineer on Facebook's site integrity team, in a company blog.

The opt-in feature is available under the Account Settings page. Users may click the link next to "Account Security," and select the option to receive notifications for log-ins from new devices. The first time users access their Facebook accounts, they must name and save the devices they use to log onto Facebook.

To block suspicious log-ins, if the Facebook system determines if someone is trying to access an account from an unknown device and asks the individual to answer a verification question to prove their identity. Identifiers could include date of birth, identifying a friend in a photograph or answering a previously-provided security question, Popov wrote.

"These questions are designed to be easy for you, and hard for a bad guy, and we've already seen some great results," he said. "Once you've confirmed your identity, you'll have the opportunity to review recent logins on your account and reset your password if you see logins that you don't recognize."

These tools -- which Popov said have been under development for several weeks -- do not, however, address Facebook's policies towards user information and privacy. The European Union's Article 29 Working Party, part of the EU's Justice and Home Affairs' Data Protection division, added its voice to those cautioning Facebook about its approach to user privacy.

Earlier this week, the division wrote to Facebook, stating its dissatisfaction with the site's changes to its privacy settings.

"It is unacceptable that the company fundamentally changed the default settings on its social-networking platform to the detriment of a user," said a statement from the Working Party. "Facebook made the change only days after the company and other social networking sites providers participated at a hearing during the Article 29 Working Party’s plenary meeting in November 2009."

In the U.S., four Senate Democrats have asked the Federal Trade Commission to develop guidelines governing the way social networking sites can use information submitted by users. Privacy groups the Federal Trade Commission and Congress that the social network is violating consumer protection laws.

Facebook hired this month former U.S. Federal Trade Commission chairman Timothy Muris to help defend the popular Web site's privacy practices in Washington, D.C.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
The Changing Face of Identity Management
Mobility and cloud services are altering the concept of user identity. Here are some ways to keep up.
Flash Poll
DevOps’ Impact on Application Security
DevOps’ Impact on Application Security
Managing the interdependency between software and infrastructure is a thorny challenge. Often, it’s a “developers are from Mars, systems engineers are from Venus” situation.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.