News
4/18/2008
07:46 PM
Terry Sweeney
Terry Sweeney
Commentary
50%
50%

Dedupe's Big Week

Data Domain and Quantum get smacked around pretty good over how "in-line" their products really are. IBM bought Diligent. And deduplication-come-latelies ExaGrid and FalconStor add new gear to the mix. Geez, maybe there really is a market here.

Data Domain and Quantum get smacked around pretty good over how "in-line" their products really are. IBM bought Diligent. And deduplication-come-latelies ExaGrid and FalconStor add new gear to the mix. Geez, maybe there really is a market here.Not that there was ever much question about that. Data deduplication, which really began to hit its stride about 18 months ago, is a backup technique that jettisons redundant files so they're only backed up once. While vendors have gone a little nuts with the marketing and promised compression ratios as outrageous of 20-to-1, users report actual results in the neighborhood of 4-to-1 to 10-to-1, plenty good enough to justify shelling out for dedupe products.

Some worried that dedupe might have a similar trajectory -- and untimely demise -- as continuous data protection (CDP). The snapshotting technology was all the rage about the time dedupe hit the market, only to fizzle when too few users materialized for the sub-second replication technology that also was expensively priced. Recall CDP pioneer and VC darling Revivio limping along till it was acquired by Symantec for a reported $20 million, less than half its $55 million funding.

Dedupe doesn't come with gold-plated pricing; its timesaving benefits make it easier to cost-justify, and storage vendors have been quick to jump on its "green" qualities and lower electrical powering costs.

Whether the Diligent acquisition signals more deals and consolidation is not a sure thing. EMC so far has been content to sign dedupe partnerships with everyone under the sun. NetApp appears to be going the homegrown route. Hitachi Data Systems has a partnership with Diligent, and who knows where Hewlett-Packard is with its dedupe thinking. Just don't be too surprised when one of these top-tier vendors snaps up Data Domain or Quantum or maybe even FalconStor. That's not any wishful thinking or investor whispering -- just markets behaving like markets.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading Tech Digest, Dec. 19, 2014
Software-defined networking can be a net plus for security. The key: Work with the network team to implement gradually, test as you go, and take the opportunity to overhaul your security strategy.
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2004-2771
Published: 2014-12-24
The expand function in fio.c in Heirloom mailx 12.5 and earlier and BSD mailx 8.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in an email address.

CVE-2014-3569
Published: 2014-12-24
The ssl23_get_client_hello function in s23_srvr.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1j does not properly handle attempts to use unsupported protocols, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via an unexpected handshake, as demonstrated by an SSLv3 handshak...

CVE-2014-4322
Published: 2014-12-24
drivers/misc/qseecom.c in the QSEECOM driver for the Linux kernel 3.x, as used in Qualcomm Innovation Center (QuIC) Android contributions for MSM devices and other products, does not validate certain offset, length, and base values within an ioctl call, which allows attackers to gain privileges or c...

CVE-2014-6132
Published: 2014-12-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI in IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository (WSRR) 6.3 through 6.3.0.5, 7.0.x through 7.0.0.5, 7.5.x through 7.5.0.4, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.3, and 8.5.x before 8.5.0.1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML vi...

CVE-2014-6153
Published: 2014-12-24
The Web UI in IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository (WSRR) 6.3.x through 6.3.0.5, 7.0.x through 7.0.0.5, 7.5.x through 7.5.0.4, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.3, and 8.5.x before 8.5.0.1 does not set the secure flag for a cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture ...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join us Wednesday, Dec. 17 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to hear what employers are really looking for in a chief information security officer -- it may not be what you think.