News
4/18/2008
07:46 PM
Terry Sweeney
Terry Sweeney
Commentary
50%
50%

Dedupe's Big Week

Data Domain and Quantum get smacked around pretty good over how "in-line" their products really are. IBM bought Diligent. And deduplication-come-latelies ExaGrid and FalconStor add new gear to the mix. Geez, maybe there really is a market here.

Data Domain and Quantum get smacked around pretty good over how "in-line" their products really are. IBM bought Diligent. And deduplication-come-latelies ExaGrid and FalconStor add new gear to the mix. Geez, maybe there really is a market here.Not that there was ever much question about that. Data deduplication, which really began to hit its stride about 18 months ago, is a backup technique that jettisons redundant files so they're only backed up once. While vendors have gone a little nuts with the marketing and promised compression ratios as outrageous of 20-to-1, users report actual results in the neighborhood of 4-to-1 to 10-to-1, plenty good enough to justify shelling out for dedupe products.

Some worried that dedupe might have a similar trajectory -- and untimely demise -- as continuous data protection (CDP). The snapshotting technology was all the rage about the time dedupe hit the market, only to fizzle when too few users materialized for the sub-second replication technology that also was expensively priced. Recall CDP pioneer and VC darling Revivio limping along till it was acquired by Symantec for a reported $20 million, less than half its $55 million funding.

Dedupe doesn't come with gold-plated pricing; its timesaving benefits make it easier to cost-justify, and storage vendors have been quick to jump on its "green" qualities and lower electrical powering costs.

Whether the Diligent acquisition signals more deals and consolidation is not a sure thing. EMC so far has been content to sign dedupe partnerships with everyone under the sun. NetApp appears to be going the homegrown route. Hitachi Data Systems has a partnership with Diligent, and who knows where Hewlett-Packard is with its dedupe thinking. Just don't be too surprised when one of these top-tier vendors snaps up Data Domain or Quantum or maybe even FalconStor. That's not any wishful thinking or investor whispering -- just markets behaving like markets.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2011-4403
Published: 2015-04-24
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Zen Cart 1.3.9h allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) delete a product via a delete_product_confirm action to product.php or (2) disable a product via a setflag action to categories.ph...

CVE-2012-2930
Published: 2015-04-24
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in TinyWebGallery (TWG) before 1.8.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a user via an adduser action to admin/index.php or (2) conduct static PHP code injection attacks in .htusers...

CVE-2012-2932
Published: 2015-04-24
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in TinyWebGallery (TWG) before 1.8.8 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) selitems[] parameter in a copy, (2) chmod, or (3) arch action to admin/index.php or (4) searchitem parameter in a search action to admin/...

CVE-2012-5451
Published: 2015-04-24
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in HttpUtils.dll in TVMOBiLi before 2.1.0.3974 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (tvMobiliService service crash) via a long string in a (1) GET or (2) HEAD request to TCP port 30888.

CVE-2015-0297
Published: 2015-04-24
Red Hat JBoss Operations Network 3.3.1 does not properly restrict access to certain APIs, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java methos via the (1) ServerInvokerServlet or (2) SchedulerService or (3) cause a denial of service (disk consumption) via the ContentManager.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.