Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

Lessons Learned From Five Big Database Breaches In 2010

Second half of 2010 featured some major mess-ups that led to the exposure of sensitive data

Dec 22, 2010 | 04:27 PM | 

By Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer

The stream of database exposures remained steady in the second half of 2010: We saw organizations face the consequences of inept database account provisioning, bad encryption policies, poor choice of third-party vendors, and an overall indifference to security -- all of which continued to keep consumers on the watch for blips in their credit reports.

According to the recent Computing Technology Industry Association's (CompTIA's) 8th Annual Global Security Trends Study, only about half of IT professionals view security as a major priority. It's no surprise, then, that the survey found 63 percent of their companies have experienced some kind of breach this year.

In July, we explored some of the most glaring database breaches in the first half of 2010. Now we'll take a look at how we can learn from the incidents that have occurred since then.

1. Sheriff's Office in Mesa County, Colorado
Breach Details: The Sheriff's Office in Mesa County, Colo., potentially put people's lives at risk due to an IT snafu. The office exposed names, contact information, and Social Security numbers of drug informants when an IT staffer mistakenly put the extremely sensitive database containing this information onto an unsecure FTP site on a server owned by the county. The database contained 200,000 files. The county came to find out about the problem when an informant on the database saw the informants' names popping up on a Google search -- the search engine's crawler had been going through the FTP site.

Database Security Lessons Learned: This is a particularly egregious example of what can happen when organizations aren't mindful about where and how databases are stored. Organizations need to endeavor to have a better understanding of where their databases reside (including test databases) and how they're configured to better ensure the most top secret of information isn't mistakenly left online.

2. Ohio State University
Breach Details: A database server containing the personal information of more than 760,000 students, faculty, and alumni at Ohio State University was hacked in an attack the university says was likely not for the information itself. School officials say preliminary information shows the server was used to launch attacks on some unnamed business. Even though the school says it doesn't believe the information was accessed, OSU offered a year of free credit monitoring for all affected by the breach.

Database Security Lessons Learned: Universities are increasingly becoming the leading headliners in news of high-profile database breaches. The particulars of this attack are still forthcoming, however the university did say it had been ongoing for months before it was discovered. Better monitoring of the server and database itself could have potentially alerted officials earlier and provided better evidence about whether database records were improperly accessed.

3. Gawker
Breach Details: An embarrassing breach that exposed the log-in credentials of 1.3 million Gawker users was caused by hackers with a grudge against the site. By exploiting a vulnerability in the Gawker website source code and using that weakness to dig deeper into its main user database, attackers gained enough information to publicly shame Gawker and its poor security practices.

Database Security Lessons Learned: Gawker's security inadequacies offer good lessons for plenty of other organizations. The firm had little to no patch management procedures in place, mishandled sensitive information, and had no password policies in place for internal users. Most glaringly, it was using the extremely antiquated DES encryption method for user passwords stored within the database, making them easily crackable once the database was accessed.

1 |  2 |  Next Page » 



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS



Database Security Reports

report Securing The Data Warehouse
Many enterprises are building data warehouses to centralize the ever-increasing information flowing through their organizations into useful repositories. This makes good business sense, but it opens up a slew of concerns from a security standpoint. IT professionals can apply many of the same security best practices used with databases, but there are new lessons to be learned as well.

report Defend Your Data From Malicious Insiders
The biggest threat to your company?s most sensitive data may be the employee who has legitimate access to corporate databases but less-than-legitimate intentions. And while the incidence of insider data breaches has decreased, external attacks often imitate them--and do serious damage. Follow our advice to mitigate the risk.

report Ensuring Secure Database Access
Role-based access control based on least user privilege is one of the most effective ways to prevent the compromise of corporate data. But proper provisioning is a growing challenging, due to the proliferation of "big data," NoSQLdatabases, and cloud-based data storage.

Other reports from the Database Security Tech Center:

Related Content

Establishing a Strategy for Database Security is No Longer Optional
As databases continue to grow in size, complexity and importance, enterprises struggle to identify the most appropriate controls regarding their use and misuse. The report identifies best practices, including: Implementing database activity monitoring to mitigate the high levels of risk from database vulnerabilities, and address audit findings in areas such as database segregation of duties and change management; using data security measures, such as data masking and data encryption; and monitoring privileged-user access and access to critical data.

Database Activity Monitoring Is Evolving Into Database Audit and Protection
In this report, Gartner writes that "Database audit and protection (DAP) represents an evolutionary advance in database activity monitoring tools." DAP suites provide comprehensive, cross-platform support in heterogeneous database environments to protect sensitive data from inappropriate use. Organizations are increasingly concerned with optimizing database security and mitigating risks associated with database vulnerabilities.

Protecting Against Database Attacks and Insider Threats: Top 5 Scenarios
Data security presents a multi-dimensional challenge in today's complex IT environment. Multiple access paths and permission levels have resulted in a broad array of security threats and vulnerabilities. We invite you to read this new eBook: "Protecting against database attacks and insider threats" to learn the top five scenarios and essential best practices for preventing database attacks and insider threats.

Demo: Distributed Database Security with Real-time Monitoring and Audit Protection
Organizations across the globe continue to experience compromised data caused by malicious attacks, web application vulnerabilities or unauthorized changes. View this demo and learn how IBM InfoSphere Guardium? database activity monitoring can help protect your sensitive data in distributed DBMS environments with a holistic approach to data security and compliance.

Look Beyond Native Database Auditing To Improve Security, Audit Visibility, And Real-Time Protection
Today's attacks on enterprise databases are more sophisticated than ever, and they occur so fast that it's often difficult to stop them in real time. Despite significant efforts to protect enterprise databases, the number of records breached has grown each year - due to all types of internal and external attacks and violations of corporate policy.




Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports