Cloud

8/14/2014
05:25 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Traffic To Hosting Companies Hijacked In Crypto Currency Heist

Attacker likely a current or former ISP employee, researchers say.

A crypto currency thief hijacked traffic that was meant for large hosting companies including Amazon, Digital Ocean, OVH, and others earlier this year in a heist that earned him some $83,000 in profits in more than four months, researchers revealed last week.

Researchers with Dell SecureWorks Counter Threat Unit published the new research on the attacks in conjunction with the Black Hat USA show in Las Vegas. Dell SecureWorks says some 51 networks were compromised from 19 Internet service providers as the thief redirected crypto currency miners to his own mining pool and stole their profits -- to the tune of $9,000 per day. The crypto currency hijack also interrupted network traffic for other users in the netblocks he targeted, the researchers say, but the attacker was mainly interested in the miners.

"They were man-in-the-middle hijacking crypto currency. I found my [account] was hijacked, too," says Joe Stewart, director of malware research for Dell SecureWorks. When Stewart first heard of the crypto currency theft, he figured the attacker had hijacked Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routes and redirected their mining to the rogue systems. The Internet's BGP routing protocol basically connects networks on the Internet.

It turns out Stewart was correct: The attacker had blasted phony BGP broadcasts that redirected the victims' crypto currency traffic to his server. "He only hijacked it for brief periods where he was able to capture and trap a large section of miners," Stewart says, so the hijack was not necessarily noticeable.

The attacker was successful in part because crypto currency miners employ a protocol called Stratum that has little or no security. "They're not using HTTPS, so any mining pool can send or reconnect to send to a different IP. [The protocol] trusts that they are talking to the real server."

It was that inherent trust that the hijacker capitalized on. But Stewart says the culprit also needed the administrative rights to pull off the BGP spoof, so it was likely an employee or former employee of an ISP. "Or a hacker hacked a router."

The researchers ultimately traced the malicious BGP announcements to a single router at an ISP in Canada. "We reported it to the ISP, and gave them large logs." The activity ultimately came to a halt, he says, and the ISP didn't provide any additional information on its resolution.

Dell SecureWorks' Pat Litke, who worked with Stewart on investigating the theft, says at the heart of the problem is the ISP not having proper oversight of its offending employee or former employee.

But even more unsettling was how the attacker was able to temporarily commandeer all of those IP addresses. The affected hosting providers "have a huge range of IP addresses," says Litke. "The addresses being hijacked were fairly negligible. It didn't impact them… They weren't losing money, and their customers didn't notice."

The only noticeable glitch would be that users wouldn't be able to ping a server, but that would have been seen as a temporary network problem. "Only the miners got trapped for a longer period of time," Stewart says. "We didn't see any big website hijacked in that."

It was when miners started talking online in a Bitcoin forum about lost funds that it become obvious something had gone awry. On March 22, a user named "caution" noted sketchy activity in the wafflepool.com mining pool. Other miners chimed in with similar observations of their mining systems being redirected to an IP address they didn't recognize, and ultimately, their loss of funds.

According to Dell SecureWorks, some $2.6 million in crypto currency mining occurs daily. The researchers suggest that ISPs use the Resource Public Key Infrastructure service, and miners use a Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) client to encrypt their traffic. "Miners should also implement server certificate validation. This validation ensures that the certificate the pool server sends when establishing the connection is valid and authorized for use with the connected domain, even if the domain's IP address changes," the researchers wrote in their report about the attacks.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
8/15/2014 | 9:33:10 AM
Re: Awesome
Crytpo currency mining is fraught with security risk. So I suppose the heist was not surprising given the lack of security inherent in mining. But spoofing BGP was a pretty interesting way to pull it off, for sure.
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
8/15/2014 | 7:33:20 AM
Awesome
It is the demonstration of the capabilities of cybercrime ecosystem. This hack is very interesting, the crocks are also exploring with interest the opportunity offered by virtual currencies.

 
Valentine's Emails Laced with Gandcrab Ransomware
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/14/2019
High Stress Levels Impacting CISOs Physically, Mentally
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/14/2019
Mozilla, Internet Society and Others Pressure Retailers to Demand Secure IoT Products
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  2/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5780
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Insufficient restrictions on what can be done with Apple Events in Google Chrome on macOS prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a local attacker to execute JavaScript via Apple Events.
CVE-2019-5781
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Incorrect handling of a confusable character in Omnibox in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to spoof the contents of the Omnibox (URL bar) via a crafted domain name.
CVE-2019-5782
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Incorrect optimization assumptions in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5783
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Missing URI encoding of untrusted input in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to perform a Dangling Markup Injection attack via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5766
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Incorrect handling of origin taint checking in Canvas in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page.