Attacks/Breaches

12/3/2014
02:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

With Operation Cleaver, Iran Emerges As A Cyberthreat

A hacker group's actions suggest that it is laying the groundwork for a future attack on critical infrastructure targets.

Iran has never been considered quite as much of a cyberthreat to the US as China and Russia have been in recent years. That could be a mistake.

A report released this week by Cylance suggests that state sponsored cybergroups in Iran can be just as dangerous as some of their better-regarded counterparts in other countries.

Over the past two years, researchers at Cylance have been following a hacker group dubbed Operation Cleaver that they believe has quietly infiltrated about 50 companies in critical infrastructure industries in 16 countries. The group's victims have included companies in the oil and gas sector, the energy industry, airports and the transportation sector, government and defense, and the telecommunications and technology industries.

About 10 of the victims are based in the US and include a major airline, an energy company, a medical university, and an automobile manufacturer. Many of the other firms targeted by the group are based in Middle Eastern countries like Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. Cylance also found a significant number of victims in Canada, Germany, England, France, India, Israel, Pakistan, and Turkey.

Cylance believes there's a strong likelihood there are more victims out there that the company does not know about.

What makes Operation Cleaver noteworthy is not just what the group has done so far, but also what it hasn't done, said Jon Miller, vice president of strategy at Cylance.

Like many other criminal groups in recent years, Operation Cleaver -- a moniker Cylance chose because the term appears frequently in the group's code -- has broken into systems containing a lot of confidential data, trade secrets, and intellectual property at the companies it has infiltrated.

But unlike their Russian and Chinese counterparts, which tend to grab IP and financial data where they can, the Iranian group has mostly avoided stealing such data, Miller said. Instead it has focused on gathering as much information as it can about network topologies, sensitive employee information and schedule details, identification photos, and documents pertaining to housing, telecom, and electricity infrastructures.

The pattern of compromise and the nature of the data being exfiltrated suggest that the group is scoping networks and conducting reconnaissance on them as if in preparation for a major assault at some point in the future.

The group's compromise of networks and systems in airlines and airports in South Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan is particularly troubling, Cylance said in its report. "The level of access seemed ubiquitous: Active Directory domains were fully compromised, along with entire Cisco Edge switches, routers, and internal networking infrastructure."

In some cases, the Iranian group gained complete control of the remote access infrastructures and supply chains at these organizations. In one airport, the group achieved complete access to airport gates and security control systems, potentially allowing members to spoof gate credentials.

"What they are doing right now is getting as much information as they can on as many critical infrastructure industries as they can," Miller said. "It gives them the capability to affect a very serious breach of cyber security."

For the most part, the tactics used by the group to infiltrate networks are similar to those employed by other groups. The tactics have included SQL injection attacks, spear phishing, and water holing attacks using a combination of custom-designed and publicly available malware tools.

The 20-person group, which masquerades as a construction engineering firm in Tehran, has grown considerably in sophistication over the time that Cylance has been tracking it, Miller said. The increasing sophistication of its malware code and its obfuscation techniques prompted Cylance to go public with its findings.

John Hultquist, cyber espionage practice lead at iSight Partners, which reported this year on another Iranian cyberthreat dubbed Newscaster, shared Cylance's assessment of Operation Cleaver's success at infiltrating critical infrastructure networks. But he differed somewhat in his assessment of the group's technical sophistication.

He said that iSight has been tracking Operation Cleaver for some time, as well, but under another name. From what iSight been observed so far, Cleaver appears to be a modestly funded, modestly resourced group with average skills that has nonetheless had a lot of success compromising critical systems. Many of the tools used by the group are openly available, and the attack methods themselves have been fairly common.

What it has been good at is in lying low and carrying out most of its operations clandestinely, Hultquist said. "They have made headway into very sensitive areas where they can do a lot of damage. We do have some concerns that they are carrying out reconnaissance for a major attack."

Find out how vulnerable ICS and SCADA systems are in Infographic: 70 Percent of World's Critical Utilities Breached.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How the US Chooses Which Zero-Day Vulnerabilities to Stockpile
Ricardo Arroyo, Senior Technical Product Manager, Watchguard Technologies,  1/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "He just showed up at my doorstep one day without a geotag."
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3906
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 contains hardcoded credentials in the WCF service on port 9003. An authenticated remote attacker can use these credentials to access the badge system database and modify its contents.
CVE-2019-3907
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 stores user credentials and other sensitive information with a known weak encryption method (MD5 hash of a salt and password).
CVE-2019-3908
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 stores backup files as encrypted zip files. The password to the zip is hard-coded and unchangeable. An attacker with access to these backups can decrypt them and obtain sensitive data.
CVE-2019-3909
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 database uses default credentials. Users are unable to change the credentials without vendor intervention.
CVE-2019-3910
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Crestron AM-100 before firmware version 1.6.0.2 contains an authentication bypass in the web interface's return.cgi script. Unauthenticated remote users can use the bypass to access some administrator functionality such as configuring update sources and rebooting the device.