Attacks/Breaches
11/9/2011
00:09 AM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
Repost This

Product Watch: New RedSeal App Lets Enterprises Benchmark Security Risk, Attack Surface

RedSeal 5 offers a way to deliver dashboards on security posture, company says

One of the most common problems faced by enterprise security departments is how to measure the job they're doing. This week, an upstart company is rolling out a new application that it says will help enterprises build a "security dashboard" that shows top executives how their defense initiatives are holding up.

RedSeal 5 gives enterprises a way to measure their performance in protecting critical business assets, the company says. It offers intelligence and visibility into the current state of network security controls, the efficiency of security remediation efforts, and ongoing policy compliance. It also offers a quantitative method for measuring the effectiveness of existing security controls and communicates risk clearly across the whole organization, according to the firm.

With the new dashboards, security teams can graphically represent hard-to-measure concepts, such as how exposed the company is to threats ("attack surface") and how serious the risk of penetration might be, says Mike Lloyd, chief scientist at RedSeal.

"Concepts like attack surface and overall risk can be very difficult for security to explain to top management, much less measure," says Lloyd. "We're giving them some tools to help do that."

RedSeal 5 layers an entirely new metrics and performance assessment engine on top of the company's existing tools for analyzing every potential pathway of access to the network, the company says. To visually demonstrate how attackers could compromise the enterprise's networks and where exposures exist, RedSeal 5’s metrics include key risk indicators for network security, vulnerability exposure, and policy compliance –- presented in a variety of customizable dashboards and ad-hoc reports, all available via a new Web portal.

"Before we had RedSeal 5, we didn’t have strategic metrics for tracking risk mitigation; the numbers we had from tools like scanners weren’t actionable," says Ethan Steiger, vice president and CSO of automotive market analysis company Polk, an early user of the new software. "Today we use RedSeal to demonstrate progress to our CIO in a way that allows him to truly understand the impact of changes such as deploying new business services."

"With much of risk assessment becoming vague and abstract, enterprises need meaningful security metrics that clearly demonstrate how well their security infrastructure and staff are performing to give them a more quantitative way of measuring success," says Greg Young, research vice president at Gartner. "Operators are buried in uncorrelated data produced by vulnerability scanners, IDS, SIEM, and DLP platforms. Better correlation, context, and visualization of that information layered on top of metrics can make practical and dramatic changes to security."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2012-0360
Published: 2014-04-23
Memory leak in Cisco IOS before 15.1(1)SY, when IKEv2 debugging is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via crafted packets, aka Bug ID CSCtn22376.

CVE-2012-1317
Published: 2014-04-23
The multicast implementation in Cisco IOS before 15.1(1)SY allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Route Processor crash) by sending packets at a high rate, aka Bug ID CSCts37717.

CVE-2012-1366
Published: 2014-04-23
Cisco IOS before 15.1(1)SY on ASR 1000 devices, when Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) tracking is enabled for IPv6, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted MLD packets, aka Bug ID CSCtz28544.

CVE-2012-3062
Published: 2014-04-23
Cisco IOS before 15.1(1)SY, when Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) snooping is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption or device crash) via MLD packets on a network that contains many IPv6 hosts, aka Bug ID CSCtr88193.

CVE-2012-3918
Published: 2014-04-23
Cisco IOS before 15.3(1)T on Cisco 2900 devices, when a VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 card is configured for TDM/HDLC mode, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (serial-interface outage) via certain Frame Relay traffic, aka Bug ID CSCub13317.

Best of the Web