Attacks/Breaches
4/24/2013
07:45 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Many Hacked Businesses Remain Unprepared For The Next Breach

New Ponemon report finds three-fourths of hacked organizations either have had or expect to have a breach that loses them customers and business partners

A company suffers a data breach. So, of course, it then retrenches and shores up its defenses and processes to prepare for the next attack, right? Not so much, a new survey of organizations that have suffered breaches shows: More than one-third of organizations hit by data breaches still have no formal plan or process in place to handle the next breach.

The data, gathered from 470 senior privacy and compliance professionals mainly in retail, healthcare, and pharmaceutical firms that have experienced at least one data breach, also shows the real fallout of a breach and how most organizations are well-aware of the fallout: Seventy-six percent have had or expect to have a breach that results in loss of customers and business partners, and 66 percent have, or expect to, suffer "serious" financial consequences in the wake of a breach.

Three-fourths have had or expect to suffer a breach that hurts their public image.

Even so, many of them remain unprepared for the next attack, according to the new Ponemon Institute report, "Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach?"

"Real companies involved [with data breaches] are still not having a data breach plan. It's amazing to me that we still have [companies] that have lost business" due to breaches, yet still not have a plan, says Michael Bruemmer, vice president with Experian Data Breach Resolution, which commissioned the Ponemon report.

"More than three-fourths of those expect to, or have had, material loss of customers or business or brand recognition. They get it and understand it, but [their approach] hasn't changed that much," Bruemmer says.

Nearly 40 percent that had been hit by a data breach still have no data breach preparedness plan. "They've been bitten once and go back again [without a plan] because they don't understand the importance of [having one]," he says.

Data breach insurance remains a rarity, with only 10 percent of the organizations with policies, and most don't have game plans for alerting victims whose data was exposed in the breach. Just more than 20 percent say they have teams trained to work with victims, and 65 percent have no system in place to verify that each victim was contacted.

Hacked organizations aren't fully equipped with forensics technology, either: Just one-fourth say they have the ability to correct the cause of the breach; 19 percent have advanced forensics in place to analyze the root cause of an attack; and 36 percent have tools to analyze the size and impact of a breach.

Encryption remains rare as well. Thirty-two percent encrypt sensitive information in computers and storage devices, 46 percent do not, and 22 percent were unsure.

"The study findings show that organizations need to prioritize preventing future breaches and better manage post-breach response," says Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. "In addition to improving technical safeguards, it's clear that companies also should focus more attention on meeting the needs of affected consumers that suffer a data breach."

The full report is available here for download.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-3304
Published: 2014-10-30
Directory traversal vulnerability in Dell EqualLogic PS4000 with firmware 6.0 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the default URI.

CVE-2013-7409
Published: 2014-10-30
Buffer overflow in ALLPlayer 5.6.2 through 5.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string in a .m3u (playlist) file.

CVE-2014-3446
Published: 2014-10-30
SQL injection vulnerability in wcm/system/pages/admin/getnode.aspx in BSS Continuity CMS 4.2.22640.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the nodeid parameter.

CVE-2014-3584
Published: 2014-10-30
The SamlHeaderInHandler in Apache CXF before 2.6.11, 2.7.x before 2.7.8, and 3.0.x before 3.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted SAML token in the authorization header of a request to a JAX-RS service.

CVE-2014-3623
Published: 2014-10-30
Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.x before 2.0.2, as used in Apache CXF 2.7.x before 2.7.13 and 3.0.x before 3.0.2, when using TransportBinding, does properly enforce the SAML SubjectConfirmation method security semantics, which allows remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks via unspecified vect...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.