Attacks/Breaches
4/24/2013
07:45 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Many Hacked Businesses Remain Unprepared For The Next Breach

New Ponemon report finds three-fourths of hacked organizations either have had or expect to have a breach that loses them customers and business partners

A company suffers a data breach. So, of course, it then retrenches and shores up its defenses and processes to prepare for the next attack, right? Not so much, a new survey of organizations that have suffered breaches shows: More than one-third of organizations hit by data breaches still have no formal plan or process in place to handle the next breach.

The data, gathered from 470 senior privacy and compliance professionals mainly in retail, healthcare, and pharmaceutical firms that have experienced at least one data breach, also shows the real fallout of a breach and how most organizations are well-aware of the fallout: Seventy-six percent have had or expect to have a breach that results in loss of customers and business partners, and 66 percent have, or expect to, suffer "serious" financial consequences in the wake of a breach.

Three-fourths have had or expect to suffer a breach that hurts their public image.

Even so, many of them remain unprepared for the next attack, according to the new Ponemon Institute report, "Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach?"

"Real companies involved [with data breaches] are still not having a data breach plan. It's amazing to me that we still have [companies] that have lost business" due to breaches, yet still not have a plan, says Michael Bruemmer, vice president with Experian Data Breach Resolution, which commissioned the Ponemon report.

"More than three-fourths of those expect to, or have had, material loss of customers or business or brand recognition. They get it and understand it, but [their approach] hasn't changed that much," Bruemmer says.

Nearly 40 percent that had been hit by a data breach still have no data breach preparedness plan. "They've been bitten once and go back again [without a plan] because they don't understand the importance of [having one]," he says.

Data breach insurance remains a rarity, with only 10 percent of the organizations with policies, and most don't have game plans for alerting victims whose data was exposed in the breach. Just more than 20 percent say they have teams trained to work with victims, and 65 percent have no system in place to verify that each victim was contacted.

Hacked organizations aren't fully equipped with forensics technology, either: Just one-fourth say they have the ability to correct the cause of the breach; 19 percent have advanced forensics in place to analyze the root cause of an attack; and 36 percent have tools to analyze the size and impact of a breach.

Encryption remains rare as well. Thirty-two percent encrypt sensitive information in computers and storage devices, 46 percent do not, and 22 percent were unsure.

"The study findings show that organizations need to prioritize preventing future breaches and better manage post-breach response," says Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. "In addition to improving technical safeguards, it's clear that companies also should focus more attention on meeting the needs of affected consumers that suffer a data breach."

The full report is available here for download.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-2037
Published: 2014-11-26
Openswan 2.6.40 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and IKE daemon restart) via IKEv2 packets that lack expected payloads. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE 2013-6466.

CVE-2014-6609
Published: 2014-11-26
The res_pjsip_pubsub module in Asterisk Open Source 12.x before 12.5.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted headers in a SIP SUBSCRIBE request for an event package.

CVE-2014-6610
Published: 2014-11-26
Asterisk Open Source 11.x before 11.12.1 and 12.x before 12.5.1 and Certified Asterisk 11.6 before 11.6-cert6, when using the res_fax_spandsp module, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via an out of call message, which is not properly handled in the ReceiveFax dia...

CVE-2014-7141
Published: 2014-11-26
The pinger in Squid 3.x before 3.4.8 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and crash) via a crafted type in an (1) ICMP or (2) ICMP6 packet.

CVE-2014-7142
Published: 2014-11-26
The pinger in Squid 3.x before 3.4.8 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted (1) ICMP or (2) ICMP6 packet size.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?