Attacks/Breaches
8/5/2015
08:10 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Iranian, Syrian Hackers Hit 'Gas Gauges'

Honeypots posing as gas gauge monitoring systems located in 7 nations hit with DDoS attacks, defacements, and queries from attackers.

BLACK HAT USA -- Las Vegas -- Researchers who planted honeypots posing as gas gauge monitoring systems in the US, Brazil, United Kingdom, Germany, Jordan, Russia, and the United Arab Emirates, say their phony systems were DDoS'ed, defaced, and queried for information by infamous hacktivist groups from Iran and Syria.

Trend Micro researchers Kyle Wilhoit and Stephen Hilt, here today revealed how their honeypot version of a Vedeer-Root Guardian AST gas gauge monitoring system apparently fooled a group claiming to be the Syrian Electronic Army hacking group, as well the Iranian Dark Coders hacking team.  

Overall, the 18 attacks on the gas gauges included four modifications to the phony pumps, two DDoS attacks, and 12 pump queries looking for information about the tanks.

Wilhoit and Hilt also officially released their Gaspot honeypot tool, which allows researchers as well as gas tank operators to set up their own virtual monitoring systems to track attack attempts and threats.

The DDoS attackers appeared to be the SEA, according to the researchers, given their IP address locations and their use of the LOIC DDoS tool. The Syrian hackers aimed its 2Gbps DDoS power at a Gaspot located in Washington, DC. "We were able to correlate by looking at the IP addresses they were using," Wilhoit says, in addition to a "SEA" reference in the GET string used by the attackers.

Even so, he admits that it could possibly be another group posing as SEA.

The pro-Iranian regime hacktivists Iranian Dark Coders, aka IDC, modified the names of two pumps situated in Jordan. The IDC, which is best known for defacements and malware distribution, renamed two different tank names in the systems, one  "H4CK3D by IDC-TEAM," and the other "AHAAD Was Here."

Wilhoit says all of the IPs involved were out of Iran, and the fact that they went after the honeypots in Jordan was "damn interesting." "It's interesting from a political standpoint," he says. "There's a decent case that this is more than likely IDC."

Even so, the attacks he and Hilt watched on the honeypots were fairly "tame," Wilhoit says. "From my standpoint, it was more interesting from a geopolitical standpoint, seeing Iranian IPs attacking" the honeypot in Jordan.

A worse scenario would be if an attacker were to alter information on the amount of petroleum in a pump, for instance, and cause a supply chain disruption, he says.

"You can't overflow a tank and spill gas with these" hacks, Hilt notes. "They are truly monitoring. But you can start changing the volume of the tank … It could run out of gas, but you could make it look like it's full."

A DDoS could hamper distribution and inventory, for instance.

Gaspot was configured to appear realistic, each looking a bit different and using local IP addresses for the locations where it was stationed, for example. Half were searchable via Shodan, and the other half were not.

The Guardian AST systems the honeypots mimicked are Internet-connected and don't employ PINS, Wilhoit says. "They are deployed in a very insecure fashion. But there are some products that Vedeer-Root has that support a very small PIN code," but it's just a 4-digit, all-numeric PIN, he says.

Black Hat USA is happening! Check it out here.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
cboyer010
50%
50%
cboyer010,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/14/2015 | 9:15:12 AM
Re: Yawn.
Then one can argue that there a lot of $100 bills laying around on the Internet beach.  Improperly protected sites, of which there are many, are similar easy targets and do get exploited every day.  Heavily protected sites raise curiosity as to what is so valuable behind the curtain and likewise draw attackers, albeit more often of a higher caliber.  There are a lot of people and agencies looking for sites to exploit for various reasons.  You don't need honeypots to draw them out.
harsharam
50%
50%
harsharam,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/13/2015 | 10:04:15 AM
Re: Yawn.
Excellent article
Kelly Jackson Higgins
100%
0%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
8/10/2015 | 3:12:47 PM
honeypots
Honeypots are indeed a lure of sorts, but they also provide useful insight to what attackers are going after out there. 
big1rich
50%
50%
big1rich,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/6/2015 | 3:09:18 PM
Yawn.
This is the equivalent of putting a $100 bill under a pebble on a park bench, and when somebody picks it up saying "See! Thieves are out there with the technology to reach into your wallet!" 
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Security Technologies to Watch in 2017
Emerging tools and services promise to make a difference this year. Are they on your company's list?
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
In past years, security researchers have discovered ways to hack cars, medical devices, automated teller machines, and many other targets. Dark Reading Executive Editor Kelly Jackson Higgins hosts researcher Samy Kamkar and Levi Gundert, vice president of threat intelligence at Recorded Future, to discuss some of 2016's most unusual and creative hacks by white hats, and what these new vulnerabilities might mean for the coming year.