Attacks/Breaches

12/12/2017
12:45 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Dark Web Research Shows UKs 'Riskiest' Areas to Live for Potential Identity Theft

London UK, 12 December 2017 — Research by dark web cybersecurity firm RepKnight today identifies the UK’s most ‘at risk’ areas for potential identity theft by comparing a snapshot of street addresses posted on the dark web against area population figures.

Home addresses form a key piece of the puzzle for identity theft — and with millions of pieces of other personally identifiable information also already listed on the dark web for sale (like credit card information, dates of birth and National Insurance numbers), cybercriminals do not have to work too hard to build up a profile of their targets before stealing their identity, especially if address information is available.

Topping the list of most ‘at-risk’ areas is Cambridge, followed by Dundee and Plymouth. Lerwick, Llandrindod Wells, Doncaster and Torquay also make the top 10 — each of which are significant dark web ‘postcode hotspots’ per head of population. Surprisingly, despite having the highest number of overall breaches, London’s relatively high population means the capital finds itself as low as 10th.

 

Postcode

Area

Risk index

1

CB

Cambridge

91.0

2

DD

Dundee

90.9

3

PL

Plymouth

89.8

4

M

Manchester

89.0

5

ZE

Lerwick

88.4

6

LD

Llandrindod Wells

87.6

7

DN

Doncaster

87.2

8

TQ

Torquay

86.6

9

OX

Oxford

86.4

10

Combined

London

84.9

11

BS

Bristol

83.2

12

L

Liverpool

83.2

13

PA

Paisley

83.1

14

KW

Wick

82.3

15

G

Glasgow

81.5

16

NR

Norwich

81.5

17

PH

Perth

79.3

18

SR

Sunderland

79.1

19

PR

Preston

78.3

20

CM

Chelmsford

78.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At the other end of the scale, the least at-risk areas in the UK are Harrogate, Slough, Newport, Warrington and Dudley.

Patrick Martin, cybersecurity analyst at RepKnight said: “The dark web is a hotbed for all sorts of stolen personally identifiable information — and while street addresses form a big part of identity theft, the general public must keep a close eye on suspicious activity that might indicate any wrongdoing with regards to any of their personal data.

“Looking at the data we’ve curated, if you have a look at just the number of instances of street addresses appearing on the dark web, London and the other big cities tend to feature quite highly. However, you’d expect to see dark web postcode activity featuring highly for cities because of the higher population figures. What’s more meaningful for the general public, though, is to be able to assess the chances of your own postcode appearing on the dark web, which is what RepKnight’s risk index enables you to do.”

RepKnight produced these statistics, which were based on a snapshot of dark web data dumps in October 2017, using its dark web monitoring tool BreachAlert.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
White House Cybersecurity Strategy at a Crossroads
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/17/2018
The Fundamental Flaw in Security Awareness Programs
Ira Winkler, CISSP, President, Secure Mentem,  7/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14492
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-21
Tenda AC7 through V15.03.06.44_CN, AC9 through V15.03.05.19(6318)_CN, and AC10 through V15.03.06.23_CN devices have a Stack-based Buffer Overflow via a long limitSpeed or limitSpeedup parameter to an unspecified /goform URI.
CVE-2018-3770
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
A path traversal exists in markdown-pdf version <9.0.0 that allows a user to insert a malicious html code that can result in reading the local files.
CVE-2018-3771
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
An XSS in statics-server <= 0.0.9 can be used via injected iframe in the filename when statics-server displays directory index in the browser.
CVE-2018-5065
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have a Use-after-free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.
CVE-2018-5066
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have an Out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.