Attacks/Breaches

9/7/2018
05:05 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Apple (Finally) Removes MacOS App Caught Stealing User Browser Histories

The fact that the app likely has been exfiltrating data for years is "rather f#@&'d" up, says the security researcher who reported the issue to Apple one month ago.

Apple has removed a top-rated ad blocker from its official Mac App Store after a security researcher discovered it to be quietly collecting and sending detailed user-browsing histories to a domain based in China.

The $4.99 Adware Doctor was until Friday morning listed as the fourth highest-selling app and top-grossing software product in the category of "paid utilities" in the Mac App store.

Its stated purpose is to protect users from malware and having adware served on their browsers. But the app has also been silently exfiltrating browser histories and other sensitive data from systems on which it is installed, says Patrick Wardle, founder and chief research officer of Digita Security and creator of Objective-See, a website for Mac security tools. 

"It also collects system info, a list of the user's currently running processes, and also certain types of files that users have downloaded. It tries to access the user's App Store history — but I believe a bug causes this to fail," he says.

In a blog post Friday, Wardle said he had contacted Apple about the issue one month ago and informed the company about the app's behavior. Even two years ago, in 2016, another security researcher had raised concerns about the same application trying to trick users into granting it administrative privileges on their devices, he said. But until Friday morning, Apple had not removed the app despite promising to investigate, Wardle said.

"There is rather a MASSIVE privacy issue here," Wardle wrote. "The fact that [the] application has been surreptitiously exfiltrating users' browsing history, possibly for years, is, to put it mildly, rather f#@&'d up!"

Apple did not offer any explanation for why it might have waited so long to act. But according to the company, the app has been removed and the issue, which allowed Adware Doctor to access and exfiltrate privacy-sensitive content like browser history and cookies, has been mitigated in Mojave, the next version of the macOS.

A quick check by Dark Reading shows that the app is indeed no longer available for download from the app store for US users, at least.

Wardle, a macOS security veteran and frequent presenter at major security conferences like Black Hat, said he decided to investigate Adware Doctor after another security researcher tweeted an alert about the application stealing private user files last month.

After purchasing a copy of Adware Doctor, Wardle said he used a combination of static and dynamic analysis and quickly found the application to be behaving in a manner completely inconsistent with its stated purpose. Wardle discovered that when a user gives the application permission — by clicking OK — to remove extensions, cookies, and caches from his or her browser, the app ends up surreptitiously stealing the user's browser history.

Apple apps downloaded from the company's official Mac application stores typically are sandboxed, meaning that it is constrained in the kinds of files and user information it can access, Wardle said.

But since Adware Doctor is a malware detection and removal tool, it needs access to user data and files not normally available to other applications. When the application is first launched, it asks the user for permission to access files in his or her home directory and all files and directories under it so the files can be inspected for malware. Once a user has granted that permission, the tool — like any anti-malware product — has free access to files on the devices.

In Adware Doctor's case, however, the app has been using the access to collect and exfiltrate data. "While some (such as a process list), perhaps have a legitimate reason for being collected by an anti-malware or anti-adware product, others such as the user's browsing history seem to be a blatant violation of the user's privacy," Wardle noted.

According to Apple, the issue has been mitigated in the next release of macOS via a sandboxing mechanism that ensures an app won't be able to access privacy-sensitive content after a user grants it permission to the home directory.

The fact that an app like this was allowed on Apple's official app store — supposedly the most secure source for Mac software — should be a wake-up call for the company, says Matt Lock, director of sales engineering at Varonis.

"This isn't the first time an app has collected data for questionable reasons, and it will not be the last," he says. "The irony is that consumers downloaded the app to reduce adware, but got stuck with spyware in the process."

Related Content:

 

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec. 3-6, 2018, with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
TeroH
50%
50%
TeroH,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/8/2018 | 5:34:04 PM
Still there...
Adware Doctor v1.2 by Li Wenhui is available in Europe. Is this the same app? If it is, then perhaps the other 5 apps from the same vendor should be examined also.
WebAuthn, FIDO2 Infuse Browsers, Platforms with Strong Authentication
John Fontana, Standards & Identity Analyst, Yubico,  9/19/2018
New Cold Boot Attack Gives Hackers the Keys to PCs, Macs
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  9/13/2018
Yahoo Class-Action Suits Set for Settlement
Dark Reading Staff 9/17/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Flash Poll
The Risk Management Struggle
The Risk Management Struggle
The majority of organizations are struggling to implement a risk-based approach to security even though risk reduction has become the primary metric for measuring the effectiveness of enterprise security strategies. Read the report and get more details today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-17229
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-19
Exiv2::d2Data in types.cpp in Exiv2 v0.26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) via a crafted image file.
CVE-2018-17230
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-19
Exiv2::ul2Data in types.cpp in Exiv2 v0.26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) via a crafted image file.
CVE-2018-17231
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-19
** DISPUTED ** Telegram Desktop (aka tdesktop) 1.3.14 might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and application exit) via an "Edit color palette" search that triggers an "index out of range" condition. NOTE: this issue is disputed by multiple third par...
CVE-2018-17228
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-19
nmap4j 1.1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in an includeHosts call.
CVE-2018-8889
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-19
A directory traversal vulnerability in the Connect Service of the BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Server (BEMS) 2.8.17.29 and earlier could allow an attacker to retrieve arbitrary files in the context of a BEMS administrator account.