Attacks/Breaches
4/9/2014
12:30 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

NSS Labs Releases Latest Browser Security Test Results

Internet Explorer holds the lead with over 99 percent block rate; Chrome block rate drops 13 percent.

NSS Labs today released the results and analysis from its latest Browser Security Comparative Analysis Report which evaluated the ability of eight leading browsers - Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Kingsoft Liebao, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Qihoo 360 Safe Browser, and Sogou Explorer – to block against socially engineered malware (SEM). The use of social engineering to distribute malware continues to account for the bulk of cyber attacks against both consumers and enterprises, thereby making a browser’s ability to protect against these kinds of attacks an important criterion for personal or corporate use. 

Download the NSS Labs Browser Security Comparative Analysis Report – Socially Engineered Malware.

Other key findings include:

  • Microsoft Internet Explorer Continues to Outperform Other Browsers:  With an average block rate of 99.9%, the highest zero-hour block rate, fastest average time to block, and highest consistency of protection over time percentages, Internet Explorer leads in all key test areas. Google Chrome remained in the top three, but its average block rate fell significantly to 70.7%, down from 83.17% in the previous test.
  • Cloud-based Endpoint Protection (EPP) File Scanning Provides Substantial Defenses When Integrated with Browser: Kingsoft Liebao Browser utilizes the same cloud-based file scanning system used by Kingsoft Antivirus and had the second highest overall block rate at 85.1%, ahead of Chrome by almost 15 percentage points.
  • Google’s Safe Browsing API Does Not Provide Adequate SEM Protection:  Apple Safari and Mozilla Firefox both utilize the Google Safe Browsing API and were the two lowest performing browsers in this latest test. Both also saw significant drops of around 6% in their average block rates – Safari from 10.15% to 4.1% and Firefox from 9.92% to 4.2%.
  • Chinese Browsers Tested for the First Time Prove Viable:  This year three browsers from China were included in testing for the first time and Kingsoft’s Liebao Browser jumped ahead of Google Chrome with an overall protection rate of 85.1%. Sogou Explorer had the fourth highest average block rate at 60.1%.

Commentary:  NSS Labs Research Director Randy Abrams

“Selecting a browser with robust socially engineered malware protection is one of the most critical choices consumers and enterprises can make to protect themselves. Microsoft’s SmartScreen Application Reputation technology continues to provide Internet Explorer the most effective protection against socially engineered malware,” said Randy Abrams, Research Director at NSS Labs. “This year NSS added three browsers from China. The Kingsoft Liebao browser displaced Chrome from second place by using a combination of URL filtering with the cloud-based file scanning technology that Kingsoft uses for their antivirus product. Sogou Explorer, another browser from China, was the only other tested browser to exceed 50% protection against socially engineered malware. Firefox and Safari failed to achieve 5% effectiveness and leave less technical users at considerable risk.”

The products covered in this test were:

  • Apple Safari 5.1.7
  • Google Chrome 33.0.1750
  • Kingsoft Liebao Browser 4.5.37.6837
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer 11.0.9600.16384
  • Mozilla Firefox 27.0.1
  • Opera 19.0.1326.63
  • Qihoo 360 Safe Browser 6.3.1.132
  • Sogou Explorer 4.2.6.10812

NSS Labs did not receive any compensation in return for vendor participation; All testing and research was conducted free of charge.

 

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3409
Published: 2014-10-25
The Ethernet Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) handling feature in Cisco IOS 12.2(33)SRE9a and earlier and IOS XE 3.13S and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via malformed CFM packets, aka Bug ID CSCuq93406.

CVE-2014-4620
Published: 2014-10-25
The EMC NetWorker Module for MEDITECH (aka NMMEDI) 3.0 build 87 through 90, when EMC RecoverPoint and Plink are used, stores cleartext RecoverPoint Appliance credentials in nsrmedisv.raw log files, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading these files.

CVE-2014-4623
Published: 2014-10-25
EMC Avamar 6.0.x, 6.1.x, and 7.0.x in Avamar Data Store (ADS) GEN4(S) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE), when Password Hardening before 2.0.0.4 is enabled, uses UNIX DES crypt for password hashing, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain cleartext passwords via a brute-force a...

CVE-2014-4624
Published: 2014-10-25
EMC Avamar Data Store (ADS) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE) 6.x and 7.0.x through 7.0.2-43 do not require authentication for Java API calls, which allows remote attackers to discover grid MCUser and GSAN passwords via a crafted call.

CVE-2014-6151
Published: 2014-10-25
CRLF injection vulnerability in IBM Tivoli Integrated Portal (TIP) 2.2.x allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.