Attacks/Breaches
12/13/2010
01:35 PM
50%
50%

WikiLeaks Botnet Continues Attack On MasterCard Site

"Hacktivists" say their denial of service assaults aren't intended to steal personal financial data, rather to raise awareness of companies that stopped doing business with WikiLeaks.

How Firesheep Can Hijack Web Sessions
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: How Firesheep Can Hijack Web Sessions
The pro-WikiLeaks attacks against companies that stopped doing business with the whistle-blowing organization continued over the weekend, with the MasterCard Web site suffering sporadic bouts of downtime. Likewise, Moneybookers.com, which stopped doing business with WikiLeaks in August, saw some downtime.

The pro-WikiLeaks botnet appears to be powered solely by volunteers who download and run the attack code -- dubbed Low Orbit Ion Cannon -- in manual, server-controlled, or JavaScript versions. While the JavaScript version runs directly in a browser, which makes counting the number of installations or executions difficult, the other versions of the software have so far been downloaded more than 67,000 times.

Unlike traditional botnets, which aim to steal financial information, the pro-WikiLeaks botnet relies on volunteers, calling themselves the Anonymous Group, who willingly install the software on their computer. But that may change.

According to Tal Be'ery, Web research team lead at Imperva, "by monitoring back-channel communication, we have found recommendations to create a [denial of service] utilizing JavaScript that can be run from [the] browser with no installation required. The Anonymous Group plans to camouflage the JavaScript behind appealing content -- such as pornographic images -- to entice users into unknowingly executing attacks."

Given that maliciously oriented botnet operators already use such techniques, "it isn't surprising that hacktivists are using similar techniques," said Imperva CTO Amichai Shulman.

But a statement released on Friday, reportedly from the Anonymous Group, was careful to differentiate the group's activities from criminal enterprises that aim to steal people's personal information. "Anonymous is not a group of hackers. We are average Internet Citizens ourselves and our motivation is a collective sense of being fed up with all the minor and major injustices we witness every day. We do not want to steal your personal information or credit card numbers."

The group also said it was purposefully targeting companies' Web sites, rather than their critical infrastructure -- such as MasterCard or PayPal's ability to process payments. "Our current goal is to raise awareness about WikiLeaks and the underhanded methods employed by the above companies to impair WikiLeaks' ability to function."

On a related note, on Friday, WikiLeaks issued a statement saying that it's not affiliated with the Anonymous attacks, which it neither endorses or criticizes. "This group is not affiliated with Wikileaks. There has been no contact between any Wikileaks staffer and anyone at Anonymous," according to a spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson. "We neither condemn nor applaud these attacks. We believe they are a reflection of public opinion on the actions of the targets."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Dark Reading Live EVENTS
INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
A Dark Reading Conference
While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: No, no, no! Have a Unix CRON do the pop-up reminders!
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
Enterprises are spending more of their IT budgets on cybersecurity technology. How do your organization's security plans and strategies compare to what others are doing? Here's an in-depth look.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.