Attacks/Breaches
4/24/2012
12:36 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Mac Security After Flashback: 5 Key Points

Where does the Apple security situation stand in the wake of the Flashback Trojan outbreak? Consider these important data points.

Are Macs being more actively attacked?

In the wake of the Flashback malware outbreak that successfully infected over 600,000 Macs, security watchers have declared that cyber-crime rings and nation states have begun to more actively target Macs.

"Recently, malware that targets Mac computers, such as OSX.Flashback and OSX.Sabpab, are increasing," read a blog post from Symantec. "This recent increase provides evidence that malware authors now consider Mac computers a viable battleground along with the Windows platform."

Just how bad is the security situation? Here are five related facts:

1. Flashback infections remain high. Symantec has said that the Flashback eradication campaign has been slower than expected. While over 600,000 machines were infected at one point, by Wednesday that number had dropped to less than 100,000, said Symantec. But Russian security firm Doctor Web, which discovered the malware on April 4, 2012, said that a TCP handshake problem with the sinkhole that Symantec is using to study the malware had led to undercounting. According to Doctor Web, by Thursday there were still at least 566,773 Macs infected with Flashback.

2. Security vendor predicted outbreak. Interestingly, before the widespread Flashback outbreak, F-Secure observed an earlier version of the malware, which targeted old Java vulnerabilities. "We might begin seeing a real OS X outbreak if the gang upgrades their operation a notch higher and start targeting unpatched vulnerabilities," said the F-Secure analysis. Shortly thereafter, of course, Flashback's authors got their hands on the Java zero-day vulnerability and went to town.

[ For more background on the Mac Flashback attack, see Apple Mac Attack Began With Infected WordPress Sites. ]

3. Disabling Java blocks many Mac threats. Before the mass outbreak, the F-Secure analysis had also advised Mac users that "the easiest way to avoid infection"--from malware such as Flashback--"is to just disable Java from your browser(s)." It said that based on its user surveys, most people simply don't need Java to browse the Web. Not long after the Flashback outbreak, meanwhile, what did Apple do? First, it responded with operating system upgrades that patched the Java vulnerability exploited by Flashback. But it also tweaked Java for OS X 10.7 to deactivate itself if not used for 35 days.

4. Most malware on Macs runs on Windows. "One in five Macs has malware on it. Does yours?" trumpeted the headline of a recent Sophos blog. But as anyone who's installed Mac antivirus has probably learned, almost all the malware spotted by such software infects only Windows PCs. In fact, that's the exact finding of the Sophos survey, which is based on 100,000 users of its free Mac OS X antivirus software. Notably, Sophos found that only 2.7% of all scanned Macs harbored Mac-compatible malware, adware, or other suspicious software. (In comparison, some studies that estimate that nearly half of all Windows machines harbor such software.)

5. Targeted attacks still hitting Macs. Earlier this month, Trend Micro detailed a new targeted attack with an unusual twist: the ability to infect both PCs and Macs. The attack begins with social engineering: an email with pro-Tibetan sentiments that includes a link. Clicking on the link leads to a website script that determines whether the system is running a Windows or Mac operating system. At that point, the script pushes a Java applet--designed for the correct operating environment--that breaks out of the Java sandbox, then installs a Trojan application that provides backdoor access to the machine.

While the two Trojans are written in different languages--Python for Macs, and a Windows executable for Windows PCs--the infection results appear to be the same. "Both backdoors report back to the same C&C server," reported Trend Micro. "Moreover, both backdoors have functionalities that include features to allow them to upload and download files and navigate through files and directories in the affected system, providing them further means for their lateral movement and data exfiltration activities."

In other words, attackers do appear to now be paying more attention to Macs.

At a time when cybercrime has never been more prolific and sophisticated, budgets are being cut. In response, IT is taking a hard look using third-party services--outsourcing--to meet security challenges. Our Making The Security Outsourcing Decision report outlines the various security outsourcing options available. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
R D
50%
50%
R D,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 2:01:54 PM
re: Mac Security After Flashback: 5 Key Points
As a computer guy I feel the biggest problem with Apple is they promote the idea that Apple is immune to virus's. Most of the Apple users i come in contact with feel they can't virus's that's why they use apple. I try to tell them it's mainly because apple has such a small share of the market and Microsoft Windows has such a large share that they are bigger target but Apple is not immune and they look at me like I'm crazy Apple wouldn't lie to me. As Apple's market share grows so will the desire of the hacking community to target them more often. So be prepared apple users
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3409
Published: 2014-10-25
The Ethernet Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) handling feature in Cisco IOS 12.2(33)SRE9a and earlier and IOS XE 3.13S and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via malformed CFM packets, aka Bug ID CSCuq93406.

CVE-2014-4620
Published: 2014-10-25
The EMC NetWorker Module for MEDITECH (aka NMMEDI) 3.0 build 87 through 90, when EMC RecoverPoint and Plink are used, stores cleartext RecoverPoint Appliance credentials in nsrmedisv.raw log files, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading these files.

CVE-2014-4623
Published: 2014-10-25
EMC Avamar 6.0.x, 6.1.x, and 7.0.x in Avamar Data Store (ADS) GEN4(S) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE), when Password Hardening before 2.0.0.4 is enabled, uses UNIX DES crypt for password hashing, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain cleartext passwords via a brute-force a...

CVE-2014-4624
Published: 2014-10-25
EMC Avamar Data Store (ADS) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE) 6.x and 7.0.x through 7.0.2-43 do not require authentication for Java API calls, which allows remote attackers to discover grid MCUser and GSAN passwords via a crafted call.

CVE-2014-6151
Published: 2014-10-25
CRLF injection vulnerability in IBM Tivoli Integrated Portal (TIP) 2.2.x allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.