Attacks/Breaches
11/8/2010
12:20 PM
50%
50%

Hacker Sinks Royal Navy Website

SQL injection attack used to break in and lift administrator credentials, databases from the government site.




Slideshow: 12 Worst Government Websites
(click for larger image and for full slideshow)

The motto of Britain's Royal Navy website is "Modern and Relevant."

But the big black box posted in the middle of its home page by website administrators suggests differently: "Unfortunately the Royal Navy website is currently undergoing essential maintenance. Please visit again soon."

What's behind the outage? On Friday, the Royal Navy website suffered an SQL injection attack by "TinKode," a Romanian self-described "gray hacker," who said that he'd lifted numerous administrator usernames, passwords, as well as databases from the website. According to published reports, officials took the website offline to make repairs.

According to Britain's Telegraph newspaper, "the shocking breach comes just weeks after the coalition government announced plans to make countering cyber-terrorism a major [defense] priority," backed by £500 million ($800 million) of investment.

Interestingly, the Telegraph's website was hacked in April by the so-called Romanian National Security group, in protest against the newspaper's portrayal of Romanians.

All breathlessness aside, the website hack would appear to fall far short of so-called "cyber terrorism," given that the Royal Navy website is an exercise in marketing. Furthermore, as one commenter to TinKode's disclosure put it, "Not hard to find vulnerable military site. Just use Google."

Another commenter asked, "Was it an SQL injection via the old version of VBulletin they have / had on their site?" -- referring to the vBulletin Internet forum software sold by Internet Brands. In July, the company patched a bug in vBulletin 3.8.6 that allowed attackers to see forums' administrator usernames and passwords.

Regardless, the incident should serve as a wake-up call, said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos. "We can all be thankful that Tinkode's activities appear to be have been more mischievous than dangerous. If someone with more malice in mind had hacked the site they could have used it to post malicious links on the Navy's JackSpeak blog, or embedded a Trojan horse into the site's main page."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-2027
Published: 2015-03-31
eGroupware before 1.8.006.20140217 allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks, delete arbitrary files, and possibly execute arbitrary code via the (1) addr_fields or (2) trans parameter to addressbook/csv_import.php, (3) cal_fields or (4) trans parameter to calendar/csv_import.p...

CVE-2014-2830
Published: 2015-03-31
Stack-based buffer overflow in cifskey.c or cifscreds.c in cifs-utils before 6.4, as used in pam_cifscreds, allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

CVE-2014-7876
Published: 2015-03-31
Unspecified vulnerability in HP Integrated Lights-Out (iLO) firmware 2 before 2.27 and 4 before 2.03 and iLO Chassis Management (CM) firmware before 1.30 allows remote attackers to gain privileges, execute arbitrary code, or cause a denial of service via unknown vectors.

CVE-2014-9462
Published: 2015-03-31
The _validaterepo function in sshpeer in Mercurial before 3.2.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted repository name in a clone command.

CVE-2014-9706
Published: 2015-03-31
The build_index_from_tree function in index.py in Dulwich before 0.9.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a commit with a directory path starting with .git/, which is not properly handled when checking out a working tree.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Good hackers--aka security researchers--are worried about the possible legal and professional ramifications of President Obama's new proposed crackdown on cyber criminals.