Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

U.S. China Commission Emails Hacked

Was Indian hacker group's alleged hack for India or China?

Jan 10, 2012 | 05:46 PM | 

By Kelly Jackson Higgins
Dark Reading
Attackers out of India reportedly hacked the emails of the U.S. organization commissioned with handling economic and security relations with China.

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission -- best known in the security industry for its reports calling out China for its pervasive cyberespionage activities against the U.S. -- has contacted U.S. authorities to investigate the online leak of what appears to be stolen emails and evidence of calls for targeting the Commission, according to a report by Reuters.

It remains unclear whether the hackers might have been spying on the commission for India's own benefit or on behalf of China.

"If true, it certainly has a dose of irony to it. The Indians have had many disputes with the Chinese over the years, and it seems odd to spy on a U.S. commission [whose] goal is to publicly publish their findings. Perhaps they were looking for dirt that may be too sensitive for the commission to publish," says Chester Wisniewski, a senior security adviser at Sophos Canada, of reports of the email hack. "What is probably more interesting is what these guys didn’t get [or] didn’t release."

The hackers behind the latest caper have been identified by some experts as the so-called Lords of Dharmaraja, the same group that claims to have grabbed Symantec's Norton antivirus source code. While Symantec confirmed that a hacking group had accessed some of the source code of its Norton Antivirus product, it said the code was old and not stolen directly from Symantec servers.

The data posted by the hacker group on Pastebin was documentation related to an API used in Norton Antivirus, and dates from April 1999, according to Symantec. But the Lords of Dharmaraja also shared source code associated with the 2006 version of the antivirus product with Infosec Island.

Sophos' Wisniewski says some of the Indian hacker group's claims seem questionable, but they do have source code. And that could indicate they have some legit stolen information from other sources, he says. "I saw the reports from the same hackers who seem to have acquired the Symantec source code, allegedly from hacking some Indian military systems. Some of their claims appear to be slightly dubious, although they clearly do have the source code, so we could infer that some of the other materials may, in fact, also be legitimate and unaltered," he says.

The hackers posted on Pastebin a document that allegedly comes from Indian military intelligence and includes plans to employ backdoor access provided by mobile phone makers. The document says India struck technology deals for backdoor access with Research In Motion, Nokia, and Apple in exchange for providing access to the Indian mobile market. Apple has denied providing the Indian government with a backdoor to its mobile products. In its 2010 annual report (PDF), the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission said that the Chinese government, its Communist Party, and Chinese individuals and organizations were hacking into American networks, as well as other nations'.

"Recent high-profile, China-based computer exploitations continue to suggest some level of state support. Indicators include the massive scale of these exploitations and the extensive intelligence and reconnaissance components," the report says. "The methods used during these activities are generally more sophisticated than techniques used in previous exploitations. Those responsible for these acts increasingly leverage social networking tools as well as malicious software tied to the criminal underground."

The Commission recommended that Congress ask the Oval Office to issue regular reports on these types of targeted attacks against federal agencies. "To the extent feasible, these reports should indicate points of origin for this malicious activity and planned measures to mitigate and prevent future exploitations and attacks," the report says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS



Advanced Threats Reports

report How Did They Get In? A Guide to Tracking Down The Source of an APT
If you think that your organization hasn't been affected by an advanced persistent threat, you probably haven't looked hard enough. Identifying that your organization is under attack is difficult enough; determining the scope of infiltration and damage presents a whole new level of challenge. To effectively protect against APTs, security pros will need to employ an arsenal of tools in a coordinated fashion, as well as develop new understandings of and approaches to system and data exploits. Here's a short and simple guide to this challenge.

report Detecting and Defending Against Advanced Persistent Threats
APTs are a growing problem for enterprises big and small. Protecting your organization from these targeted threats requires constant vigilance, ongoing employee training and a concerted effort to align security systems to address every phase of an APT. Companies also need to develop a remediation and response plan if, despite best efforts, defenses are breached.

report Smarter, Stealthier, Sneakier Malware
Increasingly sophisticated and targeted attacks are making it more difficult for organizations to detect and defend against the latest malware. In this compendium of recent coverage from Dark Reading, you?ll get a look at some of the newest -- and most dangerous -- malware on the Web, and what you can do to stop it.

Other reports from the Advanced Threats Tech Center:

Related Content

MOBILE SECURITY - Mapping an Ecosystem of Risk
This white paper highlights the various considerations for defending mobile applications-from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.

Software Security Delivered in the Cloud
This Solution Guide details the automated, turnkey service that requires no special security assessment expertise. It details HP's market-leading static and dynamic analysis technologies that help organizations worldwide gain insight into the security state of their essential business applications.

SANS Mobility/BYOD Security Survey
This survey, which includes input from more than 500 IT professionals, explores how organizations are managing risk around their end user mobile devices as well as what level of policies and controls enterprises have around mobile usage.

Expert Guide to Application Security - Real-time Hybrid Analysis
Explore the next generation of hybrid security analysis - what it is, how it works, and its benefits. This white paper details how hybrid application security enables organizations to resolve critical software security issues faster and at a lower cost than any other available technology.

A Mainstay Partners Study: Does Application Security Pay?
Measuring the Business Impact of Software Security Assurance Solutions: a study of 17 organizations that implemented solutions from Fortify Software, combining industry research and benchmark analysis to identify, qualify, and quantify the full range of benefits seen from their SSA investments.




Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports