Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security

// // //

DoJ Narrows Scope of DreamHost Warrant

The Department of Justice has scaled back the demands of a search warrant served to web hosting provider DreamHost.

When most IT managers think about cybersecurity, they're thinking about keeping their company's data safe from criminals and cyber-warfare opponents. Some service providers, most recently DreamHost, have expanded that list of adversaries to include the US Department of Justice. And on August 22, DreamHost scored a small victory in their most recent battle.

If you haven't been following this particular part of the news, back in July the Department of Justice obtained a federal warrant ordering DreamHost to turn over everything they had regarding www.disruptj20.org, a site hosted on the company's computers. DreamHost declined, stating that to do so would mean giving the DoJ (among other things) the IP address, and therefore a huge hint about the identity, of everyone who had ever visited the site.

Since approximately 1.3 million people had visited the site, and only 239 were arrested in the protest organized by the site, DreamHost stated that this meant the Fourth Amendment rights of approximately 1.3 million people would be violated. According to some legal analysis, DreamHost's objections are unusual since a two-step warrant process is normal.

In this two-step process, the government asks for, and receives, everything possible from a provider, then sorts through the information and throws away everything not specific to the original warrant. DreamHost objected to providing the first step because of the political nature of the site.


Want to learn more about the technology and business opportunities and challenges for the cable industry in the commercial services market? Join Light Reading in New York on November 30 for the 11th annual Future of Cable Business Services event. All cable operators and other service providers get in free.

Yesterday, news broke that the Department of Justice has scaled back its request for information. In a legal brief filed this morning, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Channing Phillips, wrote, "the Warrant was not intended to be used, and will not be used, to 'identify the political dissidents of the current administration[.]'... Nor will it be used to 'chill... free association and the right of free speech afforded by the Constitution.' "

The brief then goes on to say, "One of those challenges is that some of the evidence -- particularly the full scope of the evidence -- will be hidden from the government's view unless and until the government obtains a court order or search warrant." Translated into English, that means that the government doesn't know precisely what it's looking for until it sees everything you have. While common in cyber-warrants, this is the opposite of the logic used in most physical evidence warrants.

The DoJ said that it didn't realize that, in asking for everything DreamHost had, it would get log files that included IP addresses and has no desire to identify those who simply visited the site. DreamHost, for its part, stated in a blog post that, while it welcomes the DoJ's revisions, it doesn't believe they go far enough. DreamHost promises that it will lay out additional objections and seek further narrowing of the warrant in court proceedings on the morning of Thursday, August 24.

Disclosure: The author is a long-time customer of DreamHost and continues to host websites and email services with the company.

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-38193
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
There is a code injection vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1 and below that may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to pass strings which could potentially cause arbitrary code execution in a victims browser.
CVE-2022-38194
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
In Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1, a system property is not properly encrypted. This may lead to a local user reading sensitive information from a properties file.
CVE-2022-38192
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
A stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS may allow a remote, authenticated attacker to pass and store malicious strings via crafted queries which when accessed could potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the userâ€â&b...
CVE-2022-38362
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
Apache Airflow Docker's Provider prior to 3.0.0 shipped with an example DAG that was vulnerable to (authenticated) remote code exploit of code on the Airflow worker host.
CVE-2022-30264
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
The Emerson ROC and FloBoss RTU product lines through 2022-05-02 perform insecure filesystem operations. They utilize the ROC protocol (4000/TCP, 5000/TCP) for communications between a master terminal and RTUs. Opcode 203 of this protocol allows a master terminal to transfer files to and from the fl...