Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

Recent Breaches Spur New Thinking On Cloud Security

Cloud providers might be attractive targets for attackers, but liability can't be outsourced, experts say.

After hackers breached e-mail marketing provider Epsilon in late March, a steady stream of email apologies were sent out to customers. Unfortunately, that same channel of communication is what made Epsilon such an attractive target in the first place.

From an attacker's perspective, cloud services providers aggregate access to many victims' data into a single point of entry, experts say. And as their services become more popular, they will increasingly become the focus of attacks, according to Josh Corman, director of research for The 451 Group, an analyst firm.

"Putting more eggs into fewer baskets leads to massive breaches -- it is a force multiplier," Corman says. "Force multiplication for good and force multiplication for bad, and I think people miss the entire force multiplication concept."

In late March, Epsilon uncovered evidence of a breach. More than 100 companies were affected, including banks such as JP Morgan Chase and Citi, as well as major consumer companies such as Best Buy, Disney Destinations and Target.

The attackers only accessed client email addresses, according to Epsilon, but the marketing services firm gave few other details. Cloud providers and other third-party services firms need to be more forthright with information about breaches, Corman says.

Rather than focusing on contracts and limiting liability in cloud services deals, enterprises should focus on controls and auditability, Corman says.

"We have to let people with expertise in scale do things expertly with scale -- we are not going to stop doing these kinds of things," Corman says. "But we need to have more assurance than we have had to date because most people are very, very bad at IT security. Everyone is doing it wrong. Even the giants are doing it wrong."

Read the rest of this article
on Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
//Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Creating an Effective Incident Response Plan
Security teams are realizing their organizations will experience a cyber incident at some point. An effective incident response plan that takes into account their specific requirements and has been tested is critical. This issue of Tech Insights also includes: -a look at the newly signed cyber-incident law, -how organizations can apply behavioral psychology to incident response, -and an overview of the Open Cybersecurity Schema Framework.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-24999
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-26
qs before 6.10.3, as used in Express before 4.17.3 and other products, allows attackers to cause a Node process hang for an Express application because an __ proto__ key can be used. In many typical Express use cases, an unauthenticated remote attacker can place the attack payload in the query strin...
CVE-2022-45909
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-26
drachtio-server 0.8.18 has a heap-based buffer over-read via a long Request-URI in an INVITE request.
CVE-2022-45907
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-26
In PyTorch before trunk/89695, torch.jit.annotations.parse_type_line can cause arbitrary code execution because eval is used unsafely.
CVE-2022-45908
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-26
In PaddlePaddle before 2.4, paddle.audio.functional.get_window is vulnerable to code injection because it calls eval on a user-supplied winstr. This may lead to arbitrary code execution.
CVE-2022-44843
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-25
TOTOlink A7100RU V7.4cu.2313_B20191024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the port parameter in the setting/setOpenVpnClientCfg function.