Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News & Commentary

04:30 AM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin

WikiLeaks Strikes Again

WikiLeaks has release thousands of pages allegedly from CIA's Center for Cyber Intelligence. Just how bad is it?

WikiLeaks has done it again.

The cybersecurity world and much of the world that orbits around cybersecurity is working overtime to understand just how worried everyone should be about the news that the CIA developed advanced tools for hacking into mobile devices and messaging apps -- and now information on those tools, and the tools themselves, are in the wild.

So what has changed in the last 24 hours? The world is now aware of 7,818 web pages with 943 attachments from the CIA Center for Cyber Intelligence. And we're told that there is more, totaling "…several hundred million lines of code…", according to WikiLeaks, that may ultimately be revealed. The word "may" is important, because WikiLeaks has decided, for now, to redact many names of both CIA assets and targets, and to withhold the actual code until, "…a consensus emerges on the technical and political nature of the CIA's program and how such 'weapons' should analyzed, disarmed and published."

In a March 7 press release announcing the public disclosure, WikiLeaks wrote, "By the end of 2016, the CIA's hacking division, which formally falls under the agency's Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other 'weaponized' malware. Such is the scale of the CIA's undertaking that by 2016, its hackers had utilized more code than that used to run Facebook."

It's not news to note that the US government has developed a substantial code base of applications to use for spying through and disabling computer systems. In August of 2016, The Shadow Brokers, a hacker or group of hackers, auctioned software that it claimed had originated in a state-sponsored hacking group affiliated with the NSA. At that time, WikiLeaks claimed that it also had clean copies of the software that it would release, though no release has yet occurred.

What's new?
The information that has gotten the most attention regards "zero day" exploits that allow access to services like WhatsApp and Telegram before the encryption stage. That means users who assume that encryption is protecting their communication would instead be allowing "in the clear" access to their conversations.

Next up is the extent to which the tools seem to concentrate on devices in addition to computers. iOS, in particular, is the target of many documents, though Android is not ignored. In addition, non-computing devices like Samsung smart TVs are targeted so that the in-set camera and microphone can be used, even when the set is turned off, to spy on those in the room with the set.

What's the problem?
At first glance, there seems to be little truly earth-shaking in the WikiLeaks data dump. Few people would be surprised that the CIA was involved in writing applications to spy on computers and smartphones, that the agency was collecting exploits and malware developed by other groups, or that all of the above applications were in use. No, the surprise is that the collection of software is now available outside the agency in what could be the greatest "one stop shop" ever made available to hackers.

In past centuries, when an army retreated or abandoned an area, any guns left behind would be "spiked" so that they could not be turned around and used on their original owners. The kind of tools described by the WikiLeaks documents can't be spiked: Once in the hands of a hacker, they can be used against any target. And while WikiLeaks may be, for the moment, showing discretion in holding back the code itself, many CISOs will not assume that everyone coming into contact with the code will demonstrate the same restraint.

The CIA has not commented on the contents of the WikiLeaks documents, so there is no official word on their authenticity. While this writer has gone through some of the material, we cannot independently vouch for their authenticity. What can be confidently stated, though, is that the release of documents such as these are strong reminders that basic security measures, from keeping systems properly updated and patched, to slapping a sticky note over the webcam's lens, should not be ignored in the ongoing and escalating war against private enterprise data.

— Curtis Franklin, Security Editor, Light Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Browsers to Enforce Shorter Certificate Life Spans: What Businesses Should Know
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In Contour ( Ingress controller for Kubernetes) before version 1.7.0, a bad actor can shut down all instances of Envoy, essentially killing the entire ingress data plane. GET requests to /shutdown on port 8090 of the Envoy pod initiate Envoy's shutdown procedure. The shutdown procedure includes flip...
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In Sulu before versions 1.6.35, 2.0.10, and 2.1.1, when the "Forget password" feature on the login screen is used, Sulu asks the user for a username or email address. If the given string is not found, a response with a `400` error code is returned, along with a error message saying that th...
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Unexpected behavior violation in McAfee Total Protection (MTP) prior to 16.0.R26 allows local users to turn off real time scanning via a specially crafted object making a specific function call.
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
The ATOS/Sips (aka Atos-Magento) community module 3.0.0 to 3.0.5 for Magento allows command injection.
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime pa...