Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

3/16/2017
05:15 PM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Quick Hits
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

US-CERT Warns That HTTPS Inspection Tools Weaken TLS

Turns out that man-in-the-middling your own traffic isn't the safest way to look for man-in-the-middle attacks.

HTTPS inspection tools are, in essence, a security team's authorized man-in-the-middle attacker: they intercept encrypted SSL/TLS traffic, in order to, for example, search it for malware that uses HTTPS to connect to malicious servers. However, in an alert today, US-CERT warned that HTTPS interception weakens TLS security, advising that organizations "carefully consider the pros and cons of such products before implementing."

Normally, a Web browser will alert a user to weak ciphers, deprecated protocol versions, or other reasons that certificates should not be trusted and connections might be dangerous. Once an HTTPS interception tool is introduced, however, the user must put all its trust in the tool.

From the US-CERT alert:

"Because the HTTPS inspection product manages the protocols, ciphers, and certificate chain, the product must perform the necessary HTTPS validations. Failure to perform proper validation or adequately convey the validation status increases the probability that the client will fall victim to MiTM attacks by malicious third parties."

Unfortunately, researchers have found these products lacking when it comes to those validation practices. For example - as noted in works cited in the advisory, "The Risks of SSL Inspection" and "The Security Impact of HTTPS Interception" - some HTTPS inspection products do incomplete validation of upstream certificates, others conduct complete validation but fail to convey the results back to the client, and others will complete communication to the target server before issuing warnings to the user.   

HTTPS interception capabilities are built into a wide variety of security tools, including firewalls, secure web gateways, data loss prevention products, and other applications. A partial list of potentially affected applications is available here

US-CERT recommends that organizations use the testing resources at BadSSL.com to determine whether or not their HTTPS interception applications are properly validating certificates and preventing connections to sites using weak cryptography.

"At a minimum," states the alert, "if any of the tests in the Certificate section of badssl.com prevent a client with direct Internet access from connecting, those same clients should also refuse the connection when connected to the Internet by way of an HTTPS inspection product." 

 

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 6   >   >>
JOHAND828
50%
50%
JOHAND828,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/8/2017 | 7:36:44 AM
Great article! Very professional.
nice post thank you for sharing .
Mr Phen375
50%
50%
Mr Phen375,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/13/2017 | 11:25:37 AM
Where to find the list?
Where can I find the list to help hone down the possibilities for vulnerable devices?
TimTonne
50%
50%
TimTonne,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/11/2017 | 12:51:01 PM
re: strom-gas24
This website answer every question i had about correction. So , thank you.
LisaB845
50%
50%
LisaB845,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/29/2017 | 8:12:43 AM
re: professional logo design
this is very useful, thanks
Ludivina
50%
50%
Ludivina,
User Rank: Strategist
4/27/2017 | 2:48:14 PM
buy instagram followers web example
The HTTPS is pretty good when we talk about security, but it still needs improvements.
Shantaram
50%
50%
Shantaram,
User Rank: Ninja
4/24/2017 | 3:03:34 AM
Re: Great article! 192.168.0.1
Excellent post, i was happy to find it!
forskolinfuel
50%
50%
forskolinfuel,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/19/2017 | 11:21:21 PM
Re: phen375 review web example
A nice informative post thanks alot
marting123
50%
50%
marting123,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/17/2017 | 8:34:27 PM
Professional article.
You shared me the best information which I found for about 3 days, thanks much! Professional!
nidivivivi
50%
50%
nidivivivi,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/17/2017 | 8:28:23 PM
Thanks for your professional article!
The article - "US-CERT Warns That HTTPS Inspection Tools Weaken TLS", appreciate your great article, really very informative, perfect!
Shantaram
50%
50%
Shantaram,
User Rank: Ninja
4/17/2017 | 3:04:50 AM
Re: 192.168.l.l
It really important, thanks for sharing with us!
Page 1 / 6   >   >>
Florida Town Pays $600K to Ransomware Operators
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/20/2019
Pledges to Not Pay Ransomware Hit Reality
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  6/21/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12960
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
LiveZilla Server before 8.0.1.1 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in functions.internal.build.inc.php via the parameter p_dt_s_d.
CVE-2019-12961
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
LiveZilla Server before 8.0.1.1 is vulnerable to CSV Injection in the Export Function.
CVE-2019-12962
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
LiveZilla Server before 8.0.1.1 is vulnerable to XSS in mobile/index.php via the Accept-Language HTTP header.
CVE-2019-12963
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
LiveZilla Server before 8.0.1.1 is vulnerable to XSS in the chat.php Create Ticket Action.
CVE-2019-12964
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
LiveZilla Server before 8.0.1.1 is vulnerable to XSS in the ticket.php Subject.