Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

They Told You So

Sometimes, predictions of security threats come true

9:30 AM -- Sometimes, Wall Street analysts actually do know which way the market is heading. Sometimes, the TV meteorologist really predicts the weather correctly. And sometimes, security experts' warnings about future threats come absolutely true.

Over the past week, a number of systems and enterprises have fallen victim to vulnerabilities and exploits that have been forecast in the past. It started when a security firm uncovered the long-dormant cross-site request forgery (CSRF) bug in products from eight other security vendors. (See CSRF Bug Runs Rampant.) Analysts have been warning users about the CSRF flaw since last October (See CSRF Vulnerability: A 'Sleeping Giant'.)

Then, we saw the introduction of the Apple iPhone, a technology that hackers and researchers have been watching – and drooling over – for some time. Just hours after they got service, researchers were already disclosing vulnerabilities in the hot new device. (See i Caramba! iPhone Hacked Already.) But warnings about the iPhone were being circulated months before its release. (See Should IT Block iPhone?)

Later in the week, there was controversy over a new release of FlexiSPY, an application sold by Vervata Co. Ltd. as a means of tracking the activities of employees, children, and cheating spouses. (See FlexiSPY: Product or Trojan?) But security companies like F-Secure Corp. called the application a malicious Trojan – just as they had warned the industry when the technology was released a year ago. (See F-Secure's advisory.)

And finally, an employee at Fidelity National Information Services, a financial processing company, was fired for stealing some 2.3 million customer names and selling them to a data broker. (See Admin Accused of Stealing 2.3M Names.) The theft is consistent with forecasts last year that predicted insider data theft would increase as the market for stolen information improved. (See Stolen Data's Black Market.)

Does all of this mean that security managers should forget log analysis and go hire a psychic? No – though that might be fun. However, the trend does suggest that sometimes there is some merit to threat forecasts that might otherwise seem a bit paranoiac. Sometimes the threats are real, and it's worth taking steps to prevent them.

After all, even the TV weather guy is right once in a while.

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

  • Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL)
  • Vervata Co. Ltd.

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
    Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
    Current Issue
    How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
    This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-11844
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
    CVE-2020-6937
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
    CVE-2020-7648
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
    CVE-2020-7650
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
    CVE-2020-7654
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.