Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

Stonesoft Warns Of Complex Hacking Technique Vulnerability

Intrusion detection and prevention systems are subject to exploitation by attackers employing multiple simultaneous evasion methods, cautions the Finnish security firm.

Strategic Security Survey: Global Threat, Local Pain
Strategic Security Survey: Global Threat, Local Pain
(click image for larger view and for full slideshow)
Most intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) are vulnerable to being exploited by attackers who combine multiple evasion techniques at once, according to Stonesoft, a Finnish security firm.

"These threats are difficult to detect because the IPS cannot easily categorize or reference what it is seeing," said Stonesoft. "Add several evasions together, and evade at multiple levels simultaneously, and you have a method the IPS can no longer recognize." Indeed, the IPS or IDS wouldn't even know that it had been exploited. Stonesoft said it discovered the vulnerabilities while testing its own IPS product.

According to Jack Walsh, intrusion detection and prevention program manager at security testing organization ICSA Labs, part of Verizon Business, "We were able to validate Stonesoft's research and believe that these advanced evasion techniques can result in lost corporate assets with potentially serious consequences for breached organizations."

What's an example of how an AET works? Almost any IDS or IPS would stop attackers who try to use packet fragmentation -- a technique for fooling a firewall into loading the wrong packets, to evade security controls -- said a Stonesoft spokesperson. "However, if this is combined with random IP options and a manipulation of how data is to be interpreted on the target -- Big Endian/Little Endian -- the attacker can successfully deliver a payload containing any attack." (Big Endian and Little Endian refer to how processors handle the most versus the least significant bytes they must process.)

Stonesoft shared details of the vulnerabilities with the Finnish national computer emergency response team (CERT-FI), which will coordinate information sharing with affected vendors. While no specific manufacturers have been disclosed, Jussi Eronen, head of vulnerability coordination at CERT-FI, said, "the issues identified by Stonesoft affect a range of content inspection technology."

Furthermore, even though AETs aren't exploits but rather techniques for fooling an IDS or IPS, CERT-FI said that it "considers these techniques to be vulnerabilities, as they successfully subvert existing protections."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11844
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
CVE-2020-6937
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
CVE-2020-7648
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
CVE-2020-7650
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
CVE-2020-7654
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.