Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

03:55 AM

Shivering in Their Breaches

Afraid of bad publicity, large organizations delay in warning customers of major security failures

1:55 PM -- UPI yesterday reported that the personal information of more than 28,000 Nationwide Health Plans customers has been stolen. Medical claim data, health information, and Social Security numbers were stolen from the Waymouth, Mass. office of Concentra Preferred Systems, a Nationwide subcontractor.

The theft occurred Oct. 26. Nationwide learned of it two weeks later. It sent letters notifying customers last week.

My question is: What took them so long?

In the past week, major security breaches have been disclosed at TJX Co., Moneygram, Canada's CIBC bank, and the Swedish bank Nordea. (See TJX Breach Skewers Customers, Banks and Data Losses Strike Three More Firms.) Even the IRS seems to have misplaced 26 data tapes containing personal information of thousands of Kansas City residents. (See 26 IRS Computer Tapes Missing.)

In all of these cases, the organizations involved took three weeks or more to inform customers of the danger. Nationwide's data has been gone for almost three months. The IRS data was lost in August, but the agency still hasn't informed the individuals whose information was on the lost tapes. Nordea estimates that 250 of its customers have been attacked over the past 15 months, but warnings are only just now going out.

All of these breaches are different, and perhaps in some cases, there were extenuating circumstances. But no matter what the situation, or whose fault it may have been, customers need faster notification when a breach occurs. In cases such as TJX and Nordea, some customers weren't informed of a potential problem until after their accounts had been violated. That's too late in anybody's book.

The fact is that most large organizations are afraid to disclose potential losses of personal information, and they have every right to be. Some experts estimate that a company loses as many as 30 percent of its online and credit card customers after disclosing a security breach. In a study published earlier this month, the Ponemon Institute estimated that each lost customer record costs a company about $182 following disclosure. Clearly, the risks of making such a revelation are incredibly high.

But isn't it just as dangerous to discover a breach and say nothing to customers? If a company notifies customers in time, perhaps some of them will be able to secure their accounts so the thieves cannot use their information against them. At the very least, a prompt disclosure would seem a prudent measure against potential lawsuits alleging negligence by the company that lost the data.

The harsh reality is that many of us have already had our personal data stolen, and have never been told about it. In fact, TrustID earlier this week unveiled a free service that will let users find out if their information is among the two million bits of credit card and Social Security number data reported compromised in recent months. (See Scientific Atlanta Intros USRM.)

There are state laws that require swift disclosure of security breaches, and there should be a national law as well. But even with such laws in place, many companies continue to sweep their breaches under the rug, aware that the business losses associated with disclosure are usually greater than the fines that might be levied against companies that break those laws.

It's a dangerous game, and the stakes could be our personal information. We can only hope that companies will think of their customers' welfare first rather than their own bottom line.

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Intel Issues Fix for 'Plundervolt' SGX Flaw
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in Huawei smartphones (Y9, Honor 8X, Honor 9 Lite, Honor 9i, Y6 Pro). The applock does not perform a sufficient authentication in a rare condition. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to use the application locked by applock in an instant.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
There is an information disclosure vulnerability in certain Huawei smartphones (Mate 10;Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Changxiang 7S;P-smart;Changxiang 8 Plus;Y9 2018;Honor 9 Lite;Honor 9i;Mate 9). The software does not properly handle certain information of applications locked by applock in a rare condition...
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Huawei CloudUSM-EUA V600R006C10;V600R019C00 have an information leak vulnerability. Due to improper configuration, the attacker may cause information leak by successful exploitation.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board m...