Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/29/2009
04:01 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Panda Security Offers Free 'Cloud Antivirus'

The antivirus company says its approach protects against malware 100 times faster than traditional signature-based solutions.

The price of computer security continues its slide toward free, at least for basic protection. Following in the footsteps of open source security vendors, as well as traditional software vendors such as AVG, Microsoft, and Symantec, Panda Security on Wednesday unveiled a beta release of free security software called Panda Cloud Antivirus.

The appearance of the word "cloud" in the product title is partly a reflection of the term's trendiness: Throughout the computer industry, technical references to servers and networks are being dropped in favor of "the cloud."

At the same time, the term has a real meaning in the context of security: Only the collective data gathered from millions of users across the Internet wedded to the computing power of a data center can keep up with the lightning-quick evolution of malware.

"It's a real-time connection to the collective intelligence," said Pedro Bustamante, senior research adviser at Panda Security. "It's really different from the last 20 years of AV."

Panda Cloud Antivirus consists of a lightweight download that derives its protective ability from information gathered automatically from its users and pushed back out by Panda in the form of protective signatures.

"The more users use it, the better protected everybody is," said Bustamante.

Panda's approach also has the advantage of not placing excessive demands on local computing resources, which can slow systems down.

Jonathan Penn, an analyst at Forrester Research, sees Panda's approach as sound. "Having a consumer footprint strengthens your threat intelligence network," he said. "These desktops are your lab."

Panda's software, he said, has gone a bit further than others in terms of reducing the footprint of its client software. The company's approach, he said, helps solve latency issues around delivering signature files.

Panda claims its approach protects against malware 100 times faster than traditional signature-based solutions. It's not entirely clear, however, what qualifies as a traditional signature-based solution these days.

Penn said that while it may be fair to say that few in the security industry still rely exclusively on traditional signature-based solutions, many consumers still depend only on traditional AV software as a defense.

Based on a survey it conducted, Panda claims that 24% of users with up-to-date signature-based AV software were infected with malware and that its cloud-based approach can reduce that number by a factor of six to only 4%.

Lest anyone fear for Panda's profitability as a provider of free software, Bustamante said that the company will pursue a so-called freemium model that attempts to sell fee-based services alongside a basic free package. It's a model that's worked for AVG, which has been giving away free software while managing to sell enough paid subscriptions to grow its revenue by 75% annually over the past four years.


InformationWeek Analytics has published an independent analysis on the current state of security. Download the report here (registration required).

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8003
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
A double-free vulnerability in vrend_renderer.c in virglrenderer through 0.8.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service by triggering texture allocation failure, because vrend_renderer_resource_allocated_texture is not an appropriate place for a free.
CVE-2019-20427
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the ptlrpc module has a buffer overflow and panic, and possibly remote code execution, due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client. Interaction between req_capsule_get_size and tgt_brw_write leads to a tgt_shortio2pages integ...
CVE-2019-20428
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the ptlrpc module has an out-of-bounds read and panic due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client. The ldl_request_cancel function mishandles a large lock_count parameter.
CVE-2019-20429
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the ptlrpc module has an out-of-bounds read and panic (via a modified lm_bufcount field) due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client. This is caused by interaction between sptlrpc_svc_unwrap_request and lustre_msg_hdr_size_v2...
CVE-2019-20430
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the mdt module has an LBUG panic (via a large MDT Body eadatasize field) due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client.