Vulnerabilities / Threats //

Advanced Threats

7/31/2017
10:30 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
100%
0%

DevOps Security & the Culture of 'Yes'

Communication, collaboration, and the use of production data to drive decisions are essential for security work in a DevOps world.

I was talking to the CISO of a Fortune 500 healthcare company about how security teams work with their counterparts in other organizations. He lamented that he had recently overheard a peer refer to him derisively as the "C-S-No." That was painful to hear because it brought into focus one of his most strategic challenges, one that security leaders everywhere are facing. That is, we as an industry haven't figured out how to remain effective and relevant within organizations that are embracing rapid change by adopting DevOps technologies and methodologies to enable it.

DevOps works because it drives communication and collaboration between teams. Operations and development teams are getting faster at deploying new versions of software into cloud environments. They're achieving these gains through the adoption of new technology, but also, even more importantly, by shifting their cultures toward collaboration and iteration using real-time feedback.

Under the old model, Dev builds it and Ops runs it. Iterations take weeks or months, and if anything goes wrong, the first thing each team does is try to prove it's the other guy's fault. The new way brings the teams together, which makes problem resolution part of the process. Iterations are small, and we have tools to get real visibility into what's happening in production. If there is a problem, we can point to the data instead of each other. This focus on communication, collaboration, and the use of production data to drive decisions is the key to making security work in a DevOps world.

The principle issue that security teams face when working with other organizations is how to effectively communicate risk, priority, and tradeoffs. Just because we think something is important doesn't mean our developers and ops guys do, too. Moreover, the old approach of enforcing process and exercising veto power over releases is no longer viable. With DevOps, one thing we can be certain of is that the release is going out the door. No more C-S-No. Today, we can't just say "no." We can't even say "no, but..." We need to find ways to say "Yes, here's how we can do it."

Change in Mindset
To get into "yes" mode, we need a change in mindset that starts with communication, joint goals, and data-driven choices based on common priorities. The problem is that the accurate data that can drive informed decisions is often missing, and therefore security priorities are based on judgment calls. Moreover, even when useful data is available, the language that security teams use to communicate risk is often alien to their peers in development and ops. It's not that developers don't care about security; it's that our old methods do a poor job of educating and proving what must be prioritized. We need ways to pick from the huge list of theoretical risks we know are present — the small handful of immediate, present threats that need to be addressed now.

With that in hand, coupled with the data to back it, conversations between teams become productive and the right result comes out every time. I've never seen a developer get personally motivated to work through a long list of bug reports from a code analysis tool. However, I've also never seen an actively exploited vulnerability uncovered that developers didn't immediately jump on and stay up all night to fix. The difference is that one block of work appears to be purely formal while the other is obviously, tangibly important.

For security to work in the DevOps world - and to make DevOps work for us - we need to get away from telling people about what could be a problem and point to real, quantifiable evidence of problems and risk. If we can make that change, we can take advantage of the huge opportunities that DevOps provides, and, simultaneously, make our software and environments infinitely more secure.

Related Content:

Michael Feiertag is CEO and co-founder of tCell, the application security company that provides the foundation for DevSecOps by enabling applications to defend themselves against hackers and automated attacks. Michael has over 15 years of experience in the security space. ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Christian Bryant
100%
0%
Christian Bryant,
User Rank: Ninja
7/31/2017 | 12:04:40 PM
Yes Leads to Innovation
It's not easy to adapt to the "yes" methodology, as I learned over time trying to.  But in a way for an InfoSec engineer to say "Yes, and here's how we'll do it" is kind of a punk rock attitude.  Instead of coming off as cautious, paranoid and as hiding from the enemy, you now take on the role of combatant, leader and hero. Maybe a little dramatic, but I am myself a convert to "yes" because I find myself challenging myself more, and acting more punk rock in trying to innovate where others may settle for the standard solutions.
1.9 Billion Data Records Exposed in First Half of 2017
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/20/2017
Get Serious about IoT Security
Derek Manky, Global Security Strategist, Fortinet,  9/20/2017
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
Enterprises are spending more of their IT budgets on cybersecurity technology. How do your organization's security plans and strategies compare to what others are doing? Here's an in-depth look.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.