Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/26/2011
06:05 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

China Implicated In Hacking Of SMB Online Bank Accounts

FBI warns that small- to midsize businesses are being targeted in an attack that so far has bilked companies' accounts of millions of dollars and wired the money to Chinese companies

This time it wasn't an "advanced persistent threat" that China was associated with: a fraud alert issued by the FBI today implicates China in a cybercrime operation that bilked U.S.-based small- to midsize businesses of $11 million over the past year.

The FBI warned that it has identified 20 incidents in which SMBs' online banking credentials were stolen and their bank accounts siphoned, with the money wired to China-based economic and trade companies near the Russia border. The attackers attempted to steal some $20 million overall during the March 2010 and April 2011 timeframe.

What was most striking about the FBI alert was the rare level of detail the bureau provided for both SMBs and banks. It spelled out the transaction increments and paths used by the attackers, as well as their geographic drops and phony company names. The FBI says the stolen funds were wired to companies located in China's Heilongjiang province, with company names that include Chinese ports such as Raohe, Fuyuan, Jixi City, Xunke, Tongjiang, and Dongning, and the words "economic and trade," "trade," and "LTD."

The transactions ranged from $50,000 to $985,000, with most above $900,000. According to the FBI, the attackers had the most success in getting their hands on the money when they transferred under $500,000 per transaction. When the money is transferred, it's immediately withdrawn or transferred elsewhere. They also use money mules in the U.S. "The malicious actors also sent domestic ACH and wire transfers to money mules in the United States within minutes of conducting the overseas transfers. The domestic wire transfers range from $200 to $200,000. The intended recipients are money mules, individuals who the victim company has done business with in the past, and in one instance, a utility company located in another U.S. state," according to the FBI. These ACH transactions from the compromised bank accounts were anywhere from $222,500 to $1.3 million.

"We'd like see more of this from the FBI--specific and actionable information on a regular basis," say Nick Selby, managing director of consultancy Trident Risk Management, and a police officer. "The FBI is telling the banks what to look out for, and the business owners [as well]--both sides of the equation."

Read the rest of this article
on Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-21553
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-03
Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.1.0-9.1.0 contain an Incorrect User Management vulnerability.under some specific conditions, this can allow the CompAdmin user to elevate privileges and break out of Compliance mode. This is a critical vulnerability and Dell recommends upgrading at the earliest.
CVE-2021-21562
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-03
Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS contains an untrusted search path vulnerability. This vulnerability allows a user with (ISI_PRIV_LOGIN_SSH or ISI_PRIV_LOGIN_CONSOLE) and (ISI_PRIV_SYS_UPGRADE or ISI_PRIV_AUDIT) to provide an untrusted path which can lead to run resources that are not under the application...
CVE-2021-21563
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-03
Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS versions 8.1.2-9.1.0.x contain an Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions in its auditing component.This can lead to an authenticated user with low-privileges to trigger a denial of service event.
CVE-2021-21565
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-03
Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 9.1.0.3 and earlier contain a denial of service vulnerability. SmartConnect had an error condition that may be triggered to loop, using CPU and potentially preventing other SmartConnect DNS responses.
CVE-2021-26085
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-03
Affected versions of Atlassian Confluence Server allow remote attackers to view restricted resources via a Pre-Authorization Arbitrary File Read vulnerability in the /s/ endpoint. The affected versions are before version 7.4.10, and from version 7.5.0 before 7.12.3.