Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

Users Outraged by AOL Gaffe

Users advocate boycott, following blunder that exposes search logs of 650,000 AOL customers

The flames were hot and nasty today as users swarmed to message boards to complain about AOL's "research" blunder, which exposed the search logs of more than 650,000 of its customers to the public.

"AOL, you betrayed your users," blogs Zoli Erdos, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur. "If they are any smart, they will boycott your services."

A blogger named TechCrunch put a finer point on AOL's gaffe: "The data includes personal names, addresses, social security numbers and everything else someone might type into a search box," TechCrunch notes. "The most serious problem is the fact that many people often search on their own name, or those of their friends and family, to see what information is available about them on the net. Combine these ego searches with porn queries and you have a serious embarrassment. Combine them with "buy ecstasy" and you have evidence of a crime. Combine it with an address, social security number, etc., and you have an identity theft waiting to happen. The possibilities are endless."

The hot comments are an outgrowth of AOL's revelation late yesterday that it had released a search log file containing some 19 million queries from 658,086 subscribers from March 1 to May 31. The online service provider replaced the identities of the searchers with numbers, but it failed to mask personal information contained in the queries themselves.

AOL apologized profusely for the mistake. "This was a screwup, and we're angry and upset about it," said AOL spokesman Andrew Weinstein.

But an apology may not be enough for some users. Paul Henry, vice president of strategic accounts for Secure Computing, said a forensic analysis of the log file turned up 223 Social Security numbers and some 70 credit card numbers, though only four of the latter turned out to be valid. "This should be treated as a personal data breach, not a mistake," he says.

"No shit, it is literally jaw-dropping how stupid AOL has been," says blogger Ben Metcalfe. "Don't forget this is the very data that Google refused to hand over the U.S. [Department of Justice] -- citing reasons of privacy."

The search log, which has been pulled down by AOL but remains available on numerous mirror sites, provides a classic example of the information that can be obtained by identity thieves by simple analysis of search engine keystrokes. Activity from financial, corporate, and pornographic sites can all be tracked back to a single user through a simple analysis of the log data.

Analysts also noted that the log provides a unique opportunity for users -- and hackers -- to analyze the way search engines are used. An evaluation of the log data could give phishers some insight on user behavior that would enable them to better model their scams, they say.

AOL, which currently ranks as the number four search engine on the Web, said the search log includes only queries from customers using the AOL client and does not include queries from non-subscribers who used its free search engine during the same time period.

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

  • AOL LLC
  • Google (Nasdaq: GOOG)

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    News
    A Startup With NSA Roots Wants Silently Disarming Cyberattacks on the Wire to Become the Norm
    Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/11/2021
    Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
    Cybersecurity: What Is Truly Essential?
    Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  5/12/2021
    Commentary
    3 Cybersecurity Myths to Bust
    Etay Maor, Sr. Director Security Strategy at Cato Networks,  5/11/2021
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: Google Maps is taking "interactive" to a whole new level!
    Current Issue
    2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
    We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
    Flash Poll
    How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
    How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
    Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-15279
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
    An Improper Access Control vulnerability in the logging component of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools for Windows versions prior to 6.6.23.320 allows a regular user to learn the scanning exclusion paths. This issue was discovered during external security research.
    CVE-2021-3423
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
    Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability in the openssl component as used in Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security allows an attacker to load a third party DLL to elevate privileges. This issue affects Bitdefender GravityZone Business S...
    CVE-2020-18194
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
    Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in emlog v6.0.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by adding a crafted script as a link to a new blog post.
    CVE-2020-18195
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
    Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and delete a specific article via the component " /admin.php?action=page."
    CVE-2020-18198
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
    Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and delete specific images via the component " /admin.php?action=images."