Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

3/16/2017
05:15 PM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Quick Hits
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

US-CERT Warns That HTTPS Inspection Tools Weaken TLS

Turns out that man-in-the-middling your own traffic isn't the safest way to look for man-in-the-middle attacks.

HTTPS inspection tools are, in essence, a security team's authorized man-in-the-middle attacker: they intercept encrypted SSL/TLS traffic, in order to, for example, search it for malware that uses HTTPS to connect to malicious servers. However, in an alert today, US-CERT warned that HTTPS interception weakens TLS security, advising that organizations "carefully consider the pros and cons of such products before implementing."

Normally, a Web browser will alert a user to weak ciphers, deprecated protocol versions, or other reasons that certificates should not be trusted and connections might be dangerous. Once an HTTPS interception tool is introduced, however, the user must put all its trust in the tool.

From the US-CERT alert:

"Because the HTTPS inspection product manages the protocols, ciphers, and certificate chain, the product must perform the necessary HTTPS validations. Failure to perform proper validation or adequately convey the validation status increases the probability that the client will fall victim to MiTM attacks by malicious third parties."

Unfortunately, researchers have found these products lacking when it comes to those validation practices. For example - as noted in works cited in the advisory, "The Risks of SSL Inspection" and "The Security Impact of HTTPS Interception" - some HTTPS inspection products do incomplete validation of upstream certificates, others conduct complete validation but fail to convey the results back to the client, and others will complete communication to the target server before issuing warnings to the user.   

HTTPS interception capabilities are built into a wide variety of security tools, including firewalls, secure web gateways, data loss prevention products, and other applications. A partial list of potentially affected applications is available here

US-CERT recommends that organizations use the testing resources at BadSSL.com to determine whether or not their HTTPS interception applications are properly validating certificates and preventing connections to sites using weak cryptography.

"At a minimum," states the alert, "if any of the tests in the Certificate section of badssl.com prevent a client with direct Internet access from connecting, those same clients should also refuse the connection when connected to the Internet by way of an HTTPS inspection product." 

 

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 6   >   >>
JOHAND828
50%
50%
JOHAND828,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/8/2017 | 7:36:44 AM
Great article! Very professional.
nice post thank you for sharing .
Mr Phen375
50%
50%
Mr Phen375,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/13/2017 | 11:25:37 AM
Where to find the list?
Where can I find the list to help hone down the possibilities for vulnerable devices?
TimTonne
50%
50%
TimTonne,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/11/2017 | 12:51:01 PM
re: strom-gas24
This website answer every question i had about correction. So , thank you.
LisaB845
50%
50%
LisaB845,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/29/2017 | 8:12:43 AM
re: professional logo design
this is very useful, thanks
Ludivina
50%
50%
Ludivina,
User Rank: Strategist
4/27/2017 | 2:48:14 PM
buy instagram followers web example
The HTTPS is pretty good when we talk about security, but it still needs improvements.
Shantaram
50%
50%
Shantaram,
User Rank: Ninja
4/24/2017 | 3:03:34 AM
Re: Great article! 192.168.0.1
Excellent post, i was happy to find it!
forskolinfuel
50%
50%
forskolinfuel,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/19/2017 | 11:21:21 PM
Re: phen375 review web example
A nice informative post thanks alot
marting123
50%
50%
marting123,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/17/2017 | 8:34:27 PM
Professional article.
You shared me the best information which I found for about 3 days, thanks much! Professional!
nidivivivi
50%
50%
nidivivivi,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/17/2017 | 8:28:23 PM
Thanks for your professional article!
The article - "US-CERT Warns That HTTPS Inspection Tools Weaken TLS", appreciate your great article, really very informative, perfect!
Shantaram
50%
50%
Shantaram,
User Rank: Ninja
4/17/2017 | 3:04:50 AM
Re: 192.168.l.l
It really important, thanks for sharing with us!
Page 1 / 6   >   >>
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Breaches Are Inevitable, So Embrace the Chaos
Ariel Zeitlin, Chief Technology Officer & Co-Founder, Guardicore,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19010
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-16
Eval injection in the Math plugin of Limnoria (before 2019.11.09) and Supybot (through 2018-05-09) allows remote unprivileged attackers to disclose information or possibly have unspecified other impact via the calc and icalc IRC commands.
CVE-2019-16761
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
A specially crafted Bitcoin script can cause a discrepancy between the specified SLP consensus rules and the validation result of the [email protected] npm package. An attacker could create a specially crafted Bitcoin script in order to cause a hard-fork from the SLP consensus. All versions >1.0...
CVE-2019-16762
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
A specially crafted Bitcoin script can cause a discrepancy between the specified SLP consensus rules and the validation result of the slpjs npm package. An attacker could create a specially crafted Bitcoin script in order to cause a hard-fork from the SLP consensus. Affected users can upgrade to any...
CVE-2019-13581
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
An issue was discovered in Marvell 88W8688 Wi-Fi firmware before version p52, as used on Tesla Model S/X vehicles manufactured before March 2018, via the Parrot Faurecia Automotive FC6050W module. A heap-based buffer overflow allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary ...
CVE-2019-13582
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
An issue was discovered in Marvell 88W8688 Wi-Fi firmware before version p52, as used on Tesla Model S/X vehicles manufactured before March 2018, via the Parrot Faurecia Automotive FC6050W module. A stack overflow could lead to denial of service or arbitrary code execution.