Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

2/21/2018
02:50 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

The Mobile Threat: 4 out of 10 Businesses Report 'Significant' Risk

Organizations put efficiency and profit before security, leading to system downtime and data loss, according to inaugural research from Verizon.

When you prioritize speed and profit over mobile security, the business suffers -- yet 32% of 600 surveyed professionals continue to make the sacrifice and compromise their information. Of these, 38% say their business is "at significant risk" from mobile threats, according to new research from Verizon.

As part of its inaugural Mobile Security Index 2018, Verizon's Wireless Business Group conducted an independent study of people responsible for buying and managing mobile devices for their organizations. Participating businesses ranged from 250 to 10,000+ employees.

Generally, respondents are very aware that mobile is dangerous: 85% report their business faces at least a moderate risk from mobile security threats and 74% say the risks of mobile devices have increased over the past year. Only 1% said the mobile risk had gone down.

Overall, 27% of participants report that in the past year their company experienced a security incident resulting in data loss or system downtime where mobile devices played a key role. Eight percent say that if their company didn't experience an incident like this, one of their suppliers had. Companies were more likely to suffer data loss or downtime if they had sacrificed security, respondents say.

"Most agree that there is a serious and growing threat," says Justin Blair, executive director of Business Wireless Services at Verizon. "The key thing we've seen is companies don't have best practices in place."

The problem is, according to Blair, organizations aren't taking even basic steps to protect themselves. Survey data indicates less than half (49%) of respondents say their company has a policy for workers' public wifi use, and 47% encrypt sensitive data moving across open, public networks. Less than 40% change all their default passwords, and only 59% place limitations on which mobile apps their employees can download from the Internet.

Fear of Rogue Insiders is High

"Employees are the greatest risk," Blair notes. Nearly 80% say they considered their own employees a significant threat. It's more than fear of them losing devices; more than half (58%) of respondents worry employees will do something bad for personal or financial gain.

Businesses are most worried about losing sensitive internal information, classified company information, financial data, or personally identifiable information. Employees can compromise these resources through their company's failure to adopt basic practices, respondents report, adding that they access work programs on insecure networks, download dangerous apps, or use weak passwords.

Overall, the majority of respondents say they lack full control over the devices their employees use. Twenty-eight percent say employee-owned laptops with wifi or mobile data are used in their business. Only 61% say they own all mobile phones used for work. Those with BYOD policies, which are still popular in the workplace, say employee-owned devices are their biggest concern.

Security training is popular but not consistent. Most (86%) of respondents train employees on security, but 59% of them only give training when someone joins the company or gets a new device. Of those who are most worried about employees, 35% give no training at all.

The Growth of Mobile and IoT Threats

Nearly 60% of respondents use IoT. Those who do are more likely to say downtime is a bigger threat than data loss. The majority (79%) say IoT is the greatest risk facing organizations. "For the most part, those IoT devices are machine-to-machine communication. Most of the time there's no one involved in the operation of that data," Blair points out, adding that on a smartphone, someone is more likely to recognize abnormal behavior, like if it slows down or shuts off. Because IoT devices communicate with each other, he says, it takes far longer to pick up on the signs of a potential cyberattack.

"People may not understand the magnitude of how powerful some of those devices are, but at the same time many of them go unmanned," he continues. "In many cases it's still new, we're seeing IoT as a space that continues to grow."

Blair says there is "a little bit of unknown" when it comes to mobile security threats and solutions. Businesses know the risk is there, he says, but aren't entirely sure what do to about it. Many struggle with a lack of C-level support, perceived low threat level, lack of skills and resources, lack of budget, and lack of device user awareness, which ranked the highest as a significant barrier.

Budget is less of a problem: 61% of respondents anticipate their mobile security budget will increase in the next 12 months. Less than 40% report it will stay the same. As mobile devices become increasingly integral to peoples' jobs, Blair anticipates the enterprise focus on mobile security will continue to grow.

"It's always been my feeling that smartphones, tablets, and IoT devices are more and more becoming business-critical endpoints," he says. "If every employee has a smartphone and not a laptop, the number of mobile devices will outweigh the number of non mobile devices."

Related Content:

 

 Black Hat Asia returns to Singapore with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16772
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-07
The serialize-to-js NPM package before version 3.0.1 is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS). It does not properly mitigate against unsafe characters in serialized regular expressions. This vulnerability is not affected on Node.js environment since Node.js's implementation of RegExp.prototype.to...
CVE-2019-9464
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
In various functions of RecentLocationApps.java, DevicePolicyManagerService.java, and RecognitionService.java, there is an incorrect warning indicating an app accessed the user's location. This could dissolve the trust in the platform's permission system, with no additional execution privileges need...
CVE-2019-2220
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
In checkOperation of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible bypass of user interaction requirements due to mishandling application suspend. This could lead to local information disclosure no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVers...
CVE-2019-2221
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
In hasActivityInVisibleTask of WindowProcessController.java there?s a possible bypass of user interaction requirements due to incorrect handling of top activities in INITIALIZING state. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction ...
CVE-2019-2222
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
n ihevcd_parse_slice_data of ihevcd_parse_slice.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.0 Android...