Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

// // //
10:00 AM
Kevin Dunne
Kevin Dunne
Connect Directly
E-Mail vvv

The Adversary Within: Preventing Disaster From Insider Threats

Insiders are in a position of trust, and their elevated permissions provide opportunities to cause serious harm to critical business applications and processes.

Employees are the lifeblood of any organization, but they can also be one of the biggest risks to business continuity. Insider threats lurk around every corner, and no company is immune to these attacks. When security professionals think about insider threats, they typically think of loyal employees who quickly become malicious insiders, poised to do damage to the company or customers through fraud, data loss, or intentional disruption of business process. 

It is true that disgruntled employees are the source of many insider threats, but even happy employees are subject to credential compromises through brute force, phishing, or other types of attacks. With more and more business systems moving to the public cloud, typical network-based defenses now provide little or no protection against attacks. All a bad actor needs is a compromised credential with privileges to get into a system and cause irreparable harm. 

Related Content:

How Personally Identifiable Information Can Put Your Company at Risk

Special Report: Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises

New From The Edge: How Faster COVID-19 Research Is Being Made Possible by Secure Silicon

Insiders are in a position of trust, and their elevated permissions provide an opportunity to cause serious harm to critical business applications and processes. When employees become disgruntled, they may have elevated access across multiple business systems, which allows them to affect multiple departments and business processes. When bad actors get ahold of these privileged credentials, they can move laterally and traverse across business departments to enact greater harm. This growing risk surface is proving to be a massive vulnerability for enterprises, which are usually the victim of these insider threats. 

According to Forrester, attacks emanating from malicious insider activity are growing rapidly. In 2015, malicious insiders accounted for only 26% of internal data breaches, but that number has risen to 43% in 2020. The overall cost of insider threats is also increasing. Ponemon's "2020 Cost of Insider Threats Global Report" finds a 31% increase from $8.76 million in 2018 to $11.45 million in 2020. The typical targets for malicious insider threats include:

  • Financial systems (e.g., SAP, Oracle, NetSuite), which are exposed to fraud and misappropriation of funds and are subject to SOX compliance
  • Human resource management systems (e.g., Workday, SuccessFactors), which are rich repositories of sensitive personal and payroll data
  • Customer relationship management systems (e.g., Salesforce), which are filled with thousands or millions of rows of personally identifiable information (PII) and are subject to GDPR, CCPA, and other types of compliance
  • Electronic medical record systems (e.g., Epic, Cerner), which contain sensitive personal health information about patients and are subject to HIPAA compliance

With so many opportunities for potential business disruption and data loss, it's no surprise that the costs of insider threats are constantly increasing. 

Though the threat landscape is evolving, insider threat defenses are lagging behind, especially within the context of business-critical applications. Organizations across the board lack visibility to insider threats occurring in real time, as there is little focus on standardized procedures and monitoring of these business-critical applications. Also, the rapid shift of remote workers in quick response to the COVID-19 pandemic led companies to begin storing sensitive data in unsanctioned or unmonitored cloud services and applications so that employees could access company networks from home. 

While it is easy to gloss over this risk, companies that choose to ignore this problem increase the potential for a headline-making event. The longer an insider threat incident lingers, the more costly it gets. Ponemon's report states that incidents that took more than 90 days to contain cost organizations approximately $13.71 million on an annualized basis, while incidents that lasted less than 30 days cost roughly half of that at $7.12 million. There is a clear cost and risk advantage to being able to detect and respond to threats as they occur in real time. 

By using a multipronged approach to include a compliant, auditable, and automated process for managing and monitoring access, companies will be better prepared to handle these pervasive insider threats. Companies should adopt a zero-trust philosophy, provisioning and deprovisioning users based on a least-privilege model to ensure access is granted only to those at a specific and current job role. Continuous monitoring of all user activities across all business-critical systems is a must if organizations want to detect insider threats in real time. Companies should always be monitoring user actions against sensitive data in the business application, whether on-premises or in the cloud, and should be deploying technology to monitor employee behavior that aligns with specific requirements and policies. 

Kevin Dunne is the President of Pathlock. He has a deep interest in digital transformation and enabling businesses to unlock additional efficiency through the application of new technologies. He closely follows the emerging trends in cybersecurity and governance, risk, and ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
The Promise and Reality of Cloud Security
Cloud security has been part of the cybersecurity conversation for years but has been on the sidelines for most enterprises. The shift to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic and digital transformation projects have moved cloud infrastructure front-and-center as enterprises address the associated security risks. This report - a compilation of cutting-edge Black Hat research, in-depth Omdia analysis, and comprehensive Dark Reading reporting - explores how cloud security is rapidly evolving.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2023-02-04
There are issues with the AGE drivers for Golang and Python that enable SQL injections to occur. This impacts AGE for PostgreSQL 11 & AGE for PostgreSQL 12, all versions up-to-and-including 1.1.0, when using those drivers. The fix is to update to the latest Golang and Python drivers in addition ...
PUBLISHED: 2023-02-04
An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') [CWE-79] vulnerability in Sling App CMS version 1.1.4 and prior may allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack in multiple features. Upgrade to Apache Sling Ap...
PUBLISHED: 2023-02-04
hb-ot-layout-gsubgpos.hh in HarfBuzz through 6.0.0 allows attackers to trigger O(n^2) growth via consecutive marks during the process of looking back for base glyphs when attaching marks.
PUBLISHED: 2023-02-04
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected in GitHub repository phpipam/phpipam prior to 1.5.1.
PUBLISHED: 2023-02-04
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected in GitHub repository phpipam/phpipam prior to v1.5.1.