Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

5/6/2016
11:00 AM
Jai Vijayan
Jai Vijayan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail

The 10 Worst Vulnerabilities of The Last 10 Years

From the thousands of vulns that software vendors disclosed over the past 10 years, a few stand out for being a lot scarier than the rest.
2 of 11

OpenSSL Heartbleed Vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160)


The Heartbleed Bug in the OpenSSL cryptographic library exposed SSL-based websites and software to attacks that would have allowed information theft on an unprecedented scale. Nearly one-third of all major websites were believed vulnerable to the issue when Heartbleed was first disclosed in April 2014.


Because the vulnerability existed in the SSL/TLS encryption that websites and software use to protect information, the bug gave attackers an opportunity to eavesdrop on Web traffic, spoof users and servers and steal data directly from them.

'Heartbleed, is arguably one of the most severe and widely referenced vulnerabilities to date,' says David Chartier, vice president of marketing at Synopsys, the firm that was at the time known as Codenomicon, which discovered the threat. 'Clever nickname and iconic logo aside, Heartbleed affected over 600,000 websites alone and allowed attackers to siphon private keys and privileged credentials that could be used to eavesdrop, steal data, and impersonate users without leaving a forensic trail,' Chartier says.


Image Source: Leena Snidate / Codenomicon

Source Location: Wikimedia Commons

OpenSSL Heartbleed Vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160)

The Heartbleed Bug in the OpenSSL cryptographic library exposed SSL-based websites and software to attacks that would have allowed information theft on an unprecedented scale. Nearly one-third of all major websites were believed vulnerable to the issue when Heartbleed was first disclosed in April 2014.

Because the vulnerability existed in the SSL/TLS encryption that websites and software use to protect information, the bug gave attackers an opportunity to eavesdrop on Web traffic, spoof users and servers and steal data directly from them.

Heartbleed, is arguably one of the most severe and widely referenced vulnerabilities to date, says David Chartier, vice president of marketing at Synopsys, the firm that was at the time known as Codenomicon, which discovered the threat. Clever nickname and iconic logo aside, Heartbleed affected over 600,000 websites alone and allowed attackers to siphon private keys and privileged credentials that could be used to eavesdrop, steal data, and impersonate users without leaving a forensic trail, Chartier says.

Image Source: Leena Snidate / Codenomicon

Source Location: Wikimedia Commons

2 of 11
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
nathanwburke
50%
50%
nathanwburke,
User Rank: Author
5/9/2016 | 12:05:52 PM
Re: OS vulnerabilities
It's a good point you raise about Mac vulnerabilities. Macs are certainly increasing in the enterprise, yet security products have been largely windows-centric. With attackers looking for a way in to gain access to other data on the network, a macbook without the same protection as the windows machines would be an attractive target. 
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
5/9/2016 | 9:14:01 AM
Re: OS vulnerabilities
@Ryan: Plus, only in the past few years have people even started to pay much attention to Apple platform security.  For years, as Apple's market share was relatively tiny, people -- including attackers -- didn't care much.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/9/2016 | 7:45:29 AM
Shellshock and Heartbleed
As they were not too long ago I know all to well the scramblings behind trying to remediate these two major vulnerabilities. They were so well publicized that non-security sides of the organization were inquiring about the patching efforts.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/9/2016 | 7:41:56 AM
Re: OS vulnerabilities
Yes, I think you will start to see this as more of a commonality with the increasing Mac footprint in the market. It hasn't quite extended over to the corporate side as fast as it has from a personal perspective but regardless Mac is definitely becoming more prevalent then before. With that comes more code for the OS and more opportunities for open holes.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
5/8/2016 | 12:03:07 PM
OS vulnerabilities
It's one thing to look at the past ten years in a single lump, but it's also worth noting that many more vulnerabilities are being found for Apple OS's than Microsoft OS's these days.

Case in point: informationweek.com/ios-security-reports-say-no-iphone-is-safe/a/d-id/1319750
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
State of SMB Insecurity by the Numbers
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/17/2019
Tor Weaponized to Steal Bitcoin
Dark Reading Staff 10/18/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-8087
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-22
Information Leakage in PPPoE Packet Padding in AVM Fritz!Box 7490 with Firmware versions Fritz!OS 6.80 and 6.83 allows physically proximate attackers to view slices of previously transmitted packets or portions of memory via via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2019-10079
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-22
Apache Traffic Server is vulnerable to HTTP/2 setting flood attacks. Earlier versions of Apache Traffic Server didn't limit the number of setting frames sent from the client using the HTTP/2 protocol. Users should upgrade to Apache Traffic Server 7.1.7, 8.0.4, or later versions.
CVE-2019-12147
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-22
The Sangoma Session Border Controller (SBC) 2.3.23-119 GA web interface is vulnerable to Argument Injection via special characters in the username field. Upon successful exploitation, a remote unauthenticated user can create a local system user with sudo privileges, and use that user to login to the...
CVE-2019-12148
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-22
The Sangoma Session Border Controller (SBC) 2.3.23-119 GA web interface is vulnerable to an authentication bypass via an argument injection vulnerability involving special characters in the username field. Upon successful exploitation, a remote unauthenticated user can login into the device's admin ...
CVE-2019-12290
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-22
GNU libidn2 before 2.2.0 fails to perform the roundtrip checks specified in RFC3490 Section 4.2 when converting A-labels to U-labels. This makes it possible in some circumstances for one domain to impersonate another. By creating a malicious domain that matches a target domain except for the inclusi...