Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

6/28/2013
11:52 AM
Mike Rothman
Mike Rothman
Commentary
50%
50%

The (Attack) Path To Prioritization

Since you can't fix every vulnerability, you need to prioritize what needs to get done now and what doesn't. Using attack path data can help

When I want to troll during a speaking gig, I'll usually ask how many folks in the crowd get through their to-do lists every day. I get some uncomfortable laughter, but almost no one raises a hand (except the one numbnut in the crowd who's usually between jobs). Suffice it to say that no one doing security can get everything done. Not consistently, anyway. There are too many users clicking on too many links -- too many applications to protect and too many adversaries with too many attack vectors to think you can protect everything.

So your key to security success is to prioritize fiercely. You have to choose wisely about what really needs to get done now and what can wait for the next Ice Age since you'll never get to it. Our security management tools aren't helping, either. Your vulnerability scanner is happy to tell you that you have thousands of things to fix. As shown in Krebs' great post on the FIS breach, those folks had more than 18,000 network vulnerabilities and 291 application vulnerability past due.

Yeah, no one is getting through 18,000 vulns. Ever. You may as well turn the data center into a parking lot. But we know that not all of those 18,000 vulnerabilities represent real risks to the organization. And your job is to figure out which 100 or 200 you can fix in a reasonable time frame. An interesting way to evaluate the real "risk" is to figure out what can be accessed by an adversary, since any vulnerabilities on those devices are in play.

That brings us to the concept of attack paths. You start by spending a little bit of time determining what would be attractive targets for the attacker. I'm talking about your private customer data, your organization's intellectual property, or the photos you have of the CEO. (I think I'm kidding about that last one). Once you know what's important, you need to figure out whether an adversary can get to it and how. Even if a device is vulnerable to some kind of attack, if the adversary can't get to it, then it's not really a risk, right? So attack path becomes another attribute to determine the criticality of each vulnerability.

The problem is that you can't determine attack paths on the back of an envelope. In any network of scale, you are talking about millions of ways to get from point A to point B. To fully understand your security posture, you need to evaluate each of those paths to determine whether proper controls are in place to protect the data on those devices. This requires highly optimized algorithms (yay for math!) to factor all of this data, and it's not like you network is static. So with every new connection and every changed route, your attack paths change. The good news is that we're starting to see new offerings -- kind of like network topology tools on steroids -- that can do this math and give you an idea about which devices are exposed at any given time.

Of course, we all know that attackers tend to take an indirect path to your sensitive stuff. They compromise an interim device to gain a foothold and then move laterally through your environment until they get what they are looking for. Yeah, that complicates the math further. If it were easy, everyone would be doing it.

But of all the means to help understand your priorities, evaluating every vulnerability and/or configuration problem through the prism of an attack path is a good means to figure out what needs to get done right now and what doesn't. Mike's bold perspectives and irreverent style are invaluable as companies determine effective strategies to grapple with the dynamic security threatscape. Mike specializes in the sexy aspects of security, like protecting networks and endpoints, security management, and ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/9/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
4 Security Tips as the July 15 Tax-Day Extension Draws Near
Shane Buckley, President & Chief Operating Officer, Gigamon,  7/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15105
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Django Two-Factor Authentication before 1.12, stores the user's password in clear text in the user session (base64-encoded). The password is stored in the session when the user submits their username and password, and is removed once they complete authentication by entering a two-factor authenticati...
CVE-2020-11061
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
In Bareos Director less than or equal to 16.2.10, 17.2.9, 18.2.8, and 19.2.7, a heap overflow allows a malicious client to corrupt the director's memory via oversized digest strings sent during initialization of a verify job. Disabling verify jobs mitigates the problem. This issue is also patched in...
CVE-2020-4042
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Bareos before version 19.2.8 and earlier allows a malicious client to communicate with the director without knowledge of the shared secret if the director allows client initiated connection and connects to the client itself. The malicious client can replay the Bareos director's cram-md5 challenge to...
CVE-2020-11081
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
osquery before version 4.4.0 enables a priviledge escalation vulnerability. If a Window system is configured with a PATH that contains a user-writable directory then a local user may write a zlib1.dll DLL, which osquery will attempt to load. Since osquery runs with elevated privileges this enables l...
CVE-2020-6114
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
An exploitable SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Admin Reports functionality of Glacies IceHRM v26.6.0.OS (Commit bb274de1751ffb9d09482fd2538f9950a94c510a) . A specially crafted HTTP request can cause SQL injection. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerabi...