Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

6/21/2017
07:15 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Stack Clash' Smashed Security Fix in Linux

Linux, OpenBSD, Free BSD, Solaris security updates available to thwart newly discovered attack by researchers.

What's old is new again: an exploit protection mechanism for a known flaw in the Linux kernel has fallen to a new attack targeting an old problem.

The so-called Stack Clash vulnerability, which was discovered and disclosed by Qualys, affects Linux, OpenBSD, NetBSD, FreeBSD, and Solaris, on i386 and amd64 processors. These platforms earlier this week received patches for the vulnerability, a memory management flaw in the Linux kernel that could allow attackers to bypass security controls previously put in place to prevent memory management attacks on Linux-based servers, appliances, and even Internet of Things devices.

Qualys developed seven exploits and proof-of-concepts to demonstrate the vulnerability, which could be used by an attacker to corrupt memory and run malicious code and ultimately gain control of a targeted machine. Researchers at Qualys are urging organizations to update their Linux plaforms immediately for the flaw.

"It [the flaw] has to do with the memory management of these systems, so it's widespread in terms of scope," says Jimmy Graham, director of the product protection team at Qualys. Graham says it allows a privilege escalation-type attack.

What makes this particular vulnerability unique is that it bypasses controls and mitigations that Linux developers put in place to prevent memory-management attacks. "It shows that the specific mitigation is not effective," he says.

The attack that StackClash executes really isn't new: The concept of the memory management/pressure attack was first employed by researchers in 2005, and again in 2010. Linux developers responded to those disclosures with the so-called StackGuard Page security mitigation for the operating system - which Stack Clash cheats. "We bypassed StackGuard Page … to jump into [Linux] memory," Graham notes.

Stack Clash, which require local access to the targeted Linux machine, works like this: it overwrites a region in the kernel memory called the stack, causing confusion in the memory and allowing an attacker to "clash" with another memory region. Qualys researchers used local privilege escalation exploits against the flaw to gain full root privileges to the targeted system.

What makes the attack especially dangerous is that it can be "chained" with another vulnerability to escalate into a deeper and more pervasive attack. An attacker could employ SQL injection as well and escalate the attack to reach other shared systems in the victim organization, according to Qualys, specifically in shared, multi-tenant systems.

"This affects any kind of Linux or BSD system – appliances to back-end equipment to Web servers," Graham says.

Don Bailey, founder and CEO of Lab Mouse Security, says while these memory pressure vulnerabilities have been well-documented, Stack Clash demonstrates just how widely these flaws can be exploited by attackers.

"The design of the operating system and how it reacts to memory pressure: that's fascinating research. This opens a whole new world of embedded systems that rely on Linux … which can be vulnerable as well to this style of attacks," he says. And the obvious problem of little or no patching of embedded systems puts them even more at risk.

While Stack Clash is a local attack, Qualys researchers haven't ruled out the possibility of remote attacks via the flaw as well.

"Our research has mainly focused on local exploitation: as of this writing on June 19, 2017, we do not know of any remotely exploitable application. However, remote exploitation of the Stack Clash is not excluded; although local exploitation will always be easier, and remote exploitation will be very application-specific," Qualys wrote in a blog post on the attack.

Qualys also published technical details on Stack Clash (CVE-2017-1000364), in a security advisory as well as related flaws CVE-2017-1000365), and CVE-2017-1000367).

Related Content:

Black Hat USA returns to the fabulous Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas, Nevada, July 22-27, 2017. Click for information on the conference schedule and to register.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
AI Is Everywhere, but Don't Ignore the Basics
Howie Xu, Vice President of AI and Machine Learning at Zscaler,  9/10/2019
Fed Kaspersky Ban Made Permanent by New Rules
Dark Reading Staff 9/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-4147
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-16
IBM Sterling File Gateway 2.2.0.0 through 6.0.1.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 158413.
CVE-2019-5481
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-16
Double-free vulnerability in the FTP-kerberos code in cURL 7.52.0 to 7.65.3.
CVE-2019-5482
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-16
Heap buffer overflow in the TFTP protocol handler in cURL 7.19.4 to 7.65.3.
CVE-2019-15741
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-16
An issue was discovered in GitLab Omnibus 7.4 through 12.2.1. An unsafe interaction with logrotate could result in a privilege escalation
CVE-2019-16370
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-16
The PGP signing plugin in Gradle before 6.0 relies on the SHA-1 algorithm, which might allow an attacker to replace an artifact with a different one that has the same SHA-1 message digest, a related issue to CVE-2005-4900.