Vulnerabilities / Threats

7/26/2016
07:30 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

SentinelOne Offers $1 Million Guarantee To Stop Ransomware

Jeremiah Grossman continues his crusade to make security vendors take responsibility for their own gear.

Endpoint security firm SentinelOne is now backing its ability to block or remediate ransomware attacks with a guarantee of $1,000 per endpoint or up to $1 million per organization, the company announced today.

This move is also a sign that SentinelOne's new chief of security strategy, Jeremiah Grossman, is continuing his crusade to make security companies take on more legal responsibility for the effectiveness of their products. It's a mission he started several years ago while still with White Hat Security, which offered breach loss coverage up to $500,000 and a full-refund warranty.  

Ransomware guarantee

Although the average cost of a ransom payment may still be below $1,000 per endpoint, the overall cost of an attack may be much higher once the costs of downtime, forensic investigations, compliance fines, replacement infrastructure is included, not to mention damaged reputation, are included. Many organizations have been stuck paying up ransoms because of a combination of increasingly sophisticated cryptoransomware and inadequate backup alternatives.

By the time ransomware attackers ask for payout, they may already have the victim organization in a chokehold. In some cases, security teams can crack the crypto; in others, they cannot. However, before ransomware gets to the point of loudly announcing intself to the unfortunate end user, it's banging around the endpoint rather noisily engaging in abnormal behavior -- like scanning full file systems and beginning to encrypt them. 

So, even if a new strain of ransomware has never been seen before and has no signature, the behavior is so common to it that SentinelOne feels confident its behavioral analysis technology can detect unknown ransomware by monitoring for this sort of behavior. (The old-fashioned "locker" ransomware that didn't encrypt files has fallen out of favor, says Grossman, and ransomware operators' "path forward is really good end-to-end crypto.")

The importance of liability 

Despite the confidence in the technology and the guarantee, Grossman doesn't expect that SentinelOne's product will catch every instance of ransomware every time, though.

That hasn't stopped him from pushing for security companies to provide more liability protection -- and for software companies to take more responsibility for their security. He's received some pushback, though. "The argument [against it] is that 'you can't guarantee security,'" Grossman says. "While that's true, can we guarantee it 99% of the time?"

Grossman's counterargument is that automakers and electronics companies don't expect that every one of their products will be perfect, either, but that doesn't stop them from providing customers with product warranties that exist to cover the times when their products are not perfect. His attraction to joining SentinelOne was that they were able to provide the kind of data that insurance providers would require in order to back the kind of guarantee SentinelOne will offer.

So, despite resistance of others in the infosec community, Grossman has been unwavering in his sentiments. "I heard them loud and and clear," he says, "I just wasn't hearing them."

"Customers are now asking for this," he says, and he urges end users to keep asking security vendors for more liability, because that will push the needle forward.

Black Hat USA returns to the fabulous Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas, Nevada July 30 through Aug. 4, 2016. Click for information on the conference schedule and to register.

When asked if skepticism about and resistance to guarantees was to be expected from an infosec industry, which is risk-averse, Grossman countered that they are "risk-averse only in relation to themselves" and don't mind if their customers are at-risk.

Grossman will be presenting a session at the Black Hat conference next week about cyber insurance and some how-tos about providing guarantees like this one. 

"Fifteen years ago I knew that appsec was a problem, and 'kicking and screaming, I dragged the industry along," he says. "It's time to do it again."

Related Content:

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Cloud Security's Shared Responsibility Is Foggy
Ben Johnson, Co-founder and CTO, Obsidian Security,  9/14/2017
To Be Ready for the Security Future, Pay Attention to the Security Past
Liz Maida, Co-founder, CEO & CTO, Uplevel Security,  9/18/2017
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
Enterprises are spending more of their IT budgets on cybersecurity technology. How do your organization's security plans and strategies compare to what others are doing? Here's an in-depth look.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.