Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

3/27/2012
05:43 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Risk And Regulatory Overload

New study finds organizations worried about risk and compliance, but struggling to manage it all

Risk management is a hot topic these days, but it turns out most organizations don't really have much in the way of tools to do it.

According to a new survey by LockPath of 175 compliance and risk practitioners in the U.S., 83.6 percent say the risk level of their organizations ranks as moderate to high, but only about 43 percent have the tools and procedures for managing risk. More than 30 percent run homegrown tools, and 26 percent don't have any tools or procedures to manage risk. Meanwhile, most of these organizations have seen increased regulatory requirements over the past year.

So what gives? "It is crystal clear that, despite what some see as the maturing of risk management programs in the past several years, an alarming number of businesses remain overwhelmed by the number of regulations with which they must comply," said Chris Caldwell, CEO of LockPath, a GRC solutions provider.

Bigger companies see their risk level as higher than smaller ones, the survey found: More than one-fourth of large companies say their risk level is high, versus around 16 percent of midrange-size businesses and 6.5 percent of small to midsize ones. The midrange is ahead when it comes to having established risk and compliance processes, however, with 81.3 percent, followed by large enterprises, with 71.4 percent, and small businesses, 65.4 percent.

Two-thirds of all of the respondents say they don't calculate the costs of compliance efforts.

The healthcare industry appears to be under a lot of stress, although the majority say they do have a risk and compliance process. More than half of the professionals with healthcare organizations say their security risk is high: That's much higher than financial services, with 16.3 percent; utilities, 13.3 percent; and manufacturing, 4.5 percent.

The survey found that the top IT priorities for this year are reducing data breaches and litigation. Also on the list: cutting costs and delivering services more efficiently.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 4/7/2020
The Coronavirus & Cybersecurity: 3 Areas of Exploitation
Robert R. Ackerman Jr., Founder & Managing Director, Allegis Capital,  4/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-1627
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-08
A vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS on vMX and MX150 devices may allow an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending specific packets requiring special processing in microcode that the flow cache can't handle, causing the riot forwarding daemon to crash. By continuously sending ...
CVE-2020-1628
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-08
Juniper Networks Junos OS uses the 128.0.0.0/2 subnet for internal communications between the RE and PFEs. It was discovered that packets utilizing these IP addresses may egress an EX4300 switch, leaking configuration information such as heartbeats, kernel versions, etc. out to the Internet, leading...
CVE-2020-1629
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-08
A race condition vulnerability on Juniper Network Junos OS devices may cause the routing protocol daemon (RPD) process to crash and restart while processing a BGP NOTIFICATION message. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R7-S6; 16.2 versions prior to 16.2R2-S11; ...
CVE-2020-1630
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS devices configured with dual Routing Engines (RE), Virtual Chassis (VC) or high-availability cluster may allow a local authenticated low-privileged user with access to the shell to perform unauthorized configuration modification. This...
CVE-2020-1634
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-08
On High-End SRX Series devices, in specific configurations and when specific networking events or operator actions occur, an SPC receiving genuine multicast traffic may core. Subsequently, all FPCs in a chassis may reset causing a Denial of Service. This issue affects both IPv4 and IPv6. This issue ...