Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

7/25/2017
07:30 AM
50%
50%

Regulators Question Wells Fargo Regarding Data Breach

Scrutiny a result of a lawyer's unauthorized release of sensitive information on tens of thousands of wealthy Well Fargo customers.

Wells Fargo again finds itself embroiled in controversy after an attorney releases the names, social security numbers, and account balances for 50,000 of the institution's wealthier customers, according to a report in Bloomberg.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has contacted at least one attorney to learn more about the mishap, how it occurred, and why Wells Fargo did not detect the snafu, the report notes. The data breach occurred when an attorney representing Wells Fargo sent the sensitive documents to another attorney who was representing a client who was suing a managing director of the bank.

When the sensitive documents were sent, it was done without a confidentiality agreement between the parties or a protective order, Bloomberg reports. The plaintiff in the case, Gary Sinderbrand, a former Wells Fargo Advisors managing director, is suing Steven Sinderbfrand, his brother and also a Wells Fargo managing director, over allegations he is owed approximately $870,000 in unpaid consulting fees.

Read more about the Wells Fargo breach here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/26/2017 | 10:33:48 AM
Re: incredible
"if this is confirmed, this is big news !"

Agree with this, nobody wants bank information will be out in the public.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/26/2017 | 10:32:45 AM
Attorney to attorney
 

"an attorney representing Wells Fargo sent the sensitive documents to another attorney who was representing a client"

If it just ends there I would not think this will be any big issue, attorneys share data all the times. Better be in a secure way.

 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/26/2017 | 10:30:28 AM
Wells Fargo Breach?
I have not heard this one, why there is no noise on this, this may be important to many people.
jeandarmouni
50%
50%
jeandarmouni,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/25/2017 | 4:08:08 PM
incredible
if this is confirmed, this is big news !
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-23381
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-18
This affects all versions of package killing. If attacker-controlled user input is given, it is possible for an attacker to execute arbitrary commands. This is due to use of the child_process exec function without input sanitization.
CVE-2021-23374
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-18
This affects all versions of package ps-visitor. If attacker-controlled user input is given to the kill function, it is possible for an attacker to execute arbitrary commands. This is due to use of the child_process exec function without input sanitization.
CVE-2021-23375
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-18
This affects all versions of package psnode. If attacker-controlled user input is given to the kill function, it is possible for an attacker to execute arbitrary commands. This is due to use of the child_process exec function without input sanitization.
CVE-2021-23376
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-18
This affects all versions of package ffmpegdotjs. If attacker-controlled user input is given to the trimvideo function, it is possible for an attacker to execute arbitrary commands. This is due to use of the child_process exec function without input sanitization.
CVE-2021-23377
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-18
This affects all versions of package onion-oled-js. If attacker-controlled user input is given to the scroll function, it is possible for an attacker to execute arbitrary commands. This is due to use of the child_process exec function without input sanitization.